APCC Chief Sharmila Accuses 'Real Estate Mafia' of Controlling Amaravati Land Deals

Published: November 30, 2025 | Category: real estate news
APCC Chief Sharmila Accuses 'Real Estate Mafia' of Controlling Amaravati Land Deals

Vijayawada: Andhra Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) Chief YS Sharmila Reddy launched a scathing attack on the State government’s land acquisition plans for Amaravati, alleging that key decisions on the capital city are being influenced by a “real estate mafia.” She emphasized that people, especially farmers who gave their lands for the capital project, deserve full transparency before any fresh acquisition is initiated.

Addressing the media at Andhra Ratna Bhavan, Sharmila recalled that 29,000 farmers voluntarily surrendered 34,000 acres in the first phase, trusting the assurances given by the government. Including government lands, a total of 54,000 acres were pooled for the Amaravati capital project. Yet, she said, the region shows “no meaningful progress even after 11 years.” There are no major structures, administrative buildings, or visible infrastructure, she added, alleging that “wild weeds have replaced the promise of a world-class capital.”

She expressed shock over reports that only 700 acres remain from the original land bank and demanded clarity on returnable plots, government usage, allocations to private companies, and revenue earned. She questioned why these details were not available on the CRDA website and why the government had not released a White Paper.

Sharmila opposed the proposed second-phase acquisition of 20,000 acres, calling it coercive and unnecessary when the first-phase lands remain undeveloped. She argued that claims that Amaravati needs additional land to become a global city are misleading. Citing airport sizes in Mumbai, Bhogapuram, and Gannavaram, she said the proposal to acquire 5,000 acres for a new airport is unjustified.

Questioning the plan to allot 2,500 acres for a sports city, she pointed out that Olympic venues in Beijing and London were built on less than 150 acres, alleging the new proposals favor corporate giants rather than farmers. She said that despite major claims, 90% of investments at the recent CII Summit went to Visakhapatnam.

The PCC chief noted that the Centre contributed only Rs 1,500 crore to Amaravati in 11 years, while the state borrowed Rs 58,000 crore for capital works. Reaffirming the Congress stand, she demanded a White Paper, an all-party meeting, and protection for farmers through capital gains tax exemptions, asserting that Amaravati is “a matter of dignity, not a real estate venture.”

The allegations and demands highlight the ongoing tension between the government's development plans and the concerns of farmers and local communities. Sharmila's call for transparency and accountability in land acquisition processes is a significant aspect of the broader debate surrounding Amaravati's future.

Stay Updated with GeoSquare WhatsApp Channels

Get the latest real estate news, market insights, auctions, and project updates delivered directly to your WhatsApp. No spam, only high-value alerts.

GeoSquare Real Estate News WhatsApp Channel Preview

Never Miss a Real Estate News Update — Get Daily, High-Value Alerts on WhatsApp!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the main allegation made by YS Sharmil
Reddy against the Andhra Pradesh government? A: YS Sharmila Reddy has accused the Andhra Pradesh government of being influenced by a 'real estate mafia' in the land acquisition plans for Amaravati.
2. How much land did farmers voluntarily surrender for the Amaravati capital project?
Farmers voluntarily surrendered 34,000 acres in the first phase, and including government lands, a total of 54,000 acres were pooled for the project.
3. What is the current state of the Amaravati capital project after 11 years?
According to Sharmila, the region shows no meaningful progress, with no major structures, administrative buildings, or visible infrastructure, and wild weeds have replaced the promise of a world-class capital.
4. What does Sharmil
demand from the government regarding the land acquisition plans? A: Sharmila demands transparency, a White Paper, an all-party meeting, and protection for farmers through capital gains tax exemptions.
5. Why does Sharmil
oppose the second-phase acquisition of 20,000 acres? A: Sharmila opposes the second-phase acquisition, calling it coercive and unnecessary when the first-phase lands remain undeveloped, and argues that the claims of needing additional land for a global city are misleading.