High Court Orders Demolition of South Mumbai Building for Safety Violations

Published: January 19, 2026 | Category: Real Estate Mumbai
High Court Orders Demolition of South Mumbai Building for Safety Violations

In a significant ruling aimed at curbing illegal constructions that compromise fire safety, the Bombay High Court has ordered the demolition of unauthorized structures in a building in South Mumbai. The court's decision comes after a resident, Saba Qutty, filed a petition highlighting multiple violations by the developer, Hi Rise Realty.

Saba Qutty, a resident of Sara Palace in Madanpura, moved the High Court in May last year, alleging that the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) had failed to prevent numerous illegalities and unauthorized constructions in the building. Qutty pointed out gross violations of the sanctioned layout plans approved by the BMC. She noted that parts of the building were illegally occupied, electrical duct areas had been converted into habitable or commercial spaces, and third parties had encroached into the building’s space. Additionally, portions of the building beyond the commercially saleable area, as per the Development Control Regulations (DCR), had been sold.

The petition, filed through advocate Vedchetan Patil, detailed that Hi Rise Realty began constructing the 12-storey building in 2009 with approved building plans. These plans mandated that each floor should contain five rooms and an open duct area to be kept open for ventilation, light, and emergency access. However, when Qutty inspected the area and inquired with the developer, she was informed that the open duct areas from the 1st to 7th floors were allegedly sold or allotted to third parties.

During the hearing on December 9, 2025, the division bench of justices Ravindra Ghuge and Ashwin Bhobe reviewed a report submitted by the Mumbai fire brigade. The report highlighted several safety violations in the building, including the absence of a fixed firefighting installation system, such as a wet riser, external hydrants, an automatic sprinkler, a smoke detection system, fire pumps, an alternate source of electricity supply, a fire alarm system with a main control panel at the ground floor, and a refuge area on the 8th floor.

'We are horrified by the report,' the court stated, noting that an Occupation Certificate (OC) had not been issued, despite residents occupying the flats. The bench directed the BMC to immediately initiate steps and issue eviction notices to the residents. It also ordered the demolition of several rooms constructed by converting electrical ducts and fire ducts into living areas, and the restoration of the ducts.

However, considering the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct due to civic body elections on January 15, 2026, the court directed the authorities to initiate the demolition between January 27 and 31. This decision underscores the court's commitment to ensuring public safety and upholding building regulations, even in the face of electoral constraints.

The Bombay High Court's ruling serves as a strong deterrent to developers and builders who flout regulations, emphasizing the importance of adhering to approved plans and safety standards in construction projects. It also highlights the role of vigilant residents and the judiciary in maintaining the integrity of building codes and ensuring the safety of the public.

Stay Updated with GeoSquare WhatsApp Channels

Get the latest real estate news, market insights, auctions, and project updates delivered directly to your WhatsApp. No spam, only high-value alerts.

GeoSquare Real Estate News WhatsApp Channel Preview

Never Miss a Real Estate News Update — Get Daily, High-Value Alerts on WhatsApp!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What was the main reason for the court's order to demolish the building?
The main reason for the court's order was the severe violations of fire safety and building regulations, including the illegal conversion of open duct and electrical duct areas into residential or commercial spaces.
2. Who filed the petition against the building violations?
Saba Qutty, a resident of Sara Palace in Madanpura, filed the petition against the building violations.
3. What were some of the specific violations highlighted in the fire brigade report?
The fire brigade report highlighted the absence of a fixed firefighting installation system, including a wet riser, external hydrants, an automatic sprinkler, a smoke detection system, fire pumps, an alternate source of electricity supply, and a fire alarm system with a main control panel at the ground floor.
4. When is the demolition of the unauthorized structures scheduled to begin?
The demolition of the unauthorized structures is scheduled to begin between January 27 and 31, 2026, due to the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct for civic body elections.
5. What is the role of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) in this case?
The BMC's role is to enforce building regulations and ensure that developers adhere to approved plans. In this case, the court directed the BMC to issue eviction notices and initiate the demolition process.