MahaRERA Orders Pune Developer Krisala to Address Structural Flaws and Parking Issues

Published: April 10, 2026 | Category: Real Estate Pune
MahaRERA Orders Pune Developer Krisala to Address Structural Flaws and Parking Issues

Pune, 10th April 2026: The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has ruled that the mere issuance of an Occupancy Certificate (OC) does not constitute lawful possession if a flat remains structurally defective. In a recent order, the authority directed Pune-based developer M/S Krisala Enterprises to rectify multiple structural flaws and provide a designated covered parking space to a homebuyer, explicitly rejecting the builder’s allotment of a parking spot on a ramp.

The order, issued by MahaRERA Member Mahesh Pathak on April 2, 2026, pertains to a complaint filed by Nehanshu Kishorbhai Tank, who purchased a flat in the ‘41 ELITE’ project located in Tathwade, Pune. According to the complaint, despite the project receiving its OC in May 2024, the apartment suffered from persistent issues including ceiling seepage, wall cracks, an improper balcony slope, and defective plumbing.

Furthermore, the homebuyer alleged that the developer arbitrarily changed his originally allotted parking space to one situated on a ramp. The new spot allegedly obstructed an electrical (MSEB) board and violated the sanctioned layout.

In its defence, Krisala Enterprises claimed that “soft possession” had already been handed over, the defects were minor and cosmetic, and the ramp parking was finalized after mutual discussions. The developer argued the complaint was filed with an ulterior motive to evade maintenance and municipal charges.

Dismissing the developer’s arguments, MahaRERA observed that under the RERA Act, possession must be complete in all respects, including habitability. The authority noted that the builder failed to provide any conclusive documentary proof that the defects were rectified to the buyer’s satisfaction. Crucially, MahaRERA stated that a parking spot on a ramp cannot be considered compliance with a sale agreement that explicitly promises a “covered car parking space,” especially absent clear, unequivocal consent from the buyer.

Under Section 14(3) of the RERA Act, the authority directed the promoter to rectify all structural and workmanship defects within 30 days. Additionally, the developer must allot a proper covered parking space strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan within the same timeframe.

The authority ordered that final possession documents must be handed over within 15 days following the successful rectification and proper parking allotment. Failure to comply will invite penal action under Section 63 of the Act. However, MahaRERA declined to grant the homebuyer interest for delayed possession, noting that the project’s OC had been obtained and possession formally offered.

Stay Updated with GeoSquare WhatsApp Channels

Get the latest real estate news, market insights, auctions, and project updates delivered directly to your WhatsApp. No spam, only high-value alerts.

GeoSquare Real Estate News WhatsApp Channel Preview

Never Miss a Real Estate News Update — Get Daily, High-Value Alerts on WhatsApp!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the MahaRERA?
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) is a regulatory body established under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, to promote transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the real estate sector in Maharashtra.
2. What was the main issue in the complaint against Krisal
Enterprises? A: The main issue in the complaint was that the purchased flat had multiple structural defects such as ceiling seepage, wall cracks, an improper balcony slope, and defective plumbing. Additionally, the developer had arbitrarily changed the allotted parking space to one on a ramp.
3. What did MahaRER
order Krisala Enterprises to do? A: MahaRERA ordered Krisala Enterprises to rectify all structural and workmanship defects within 30 days and to provide a proper covered parking space as per the sanctioned plan within the same timeframe.
4. Why did MahaRER
reject the developer's argument about the ramp parking spot? A: MahaRERA rejected the developer's argument because a parking spot on a ramp does not comply with the sale agreement that explicitly promises a ‘covered car parking space,’ and there was no clear, unequivocal consent from the buyer.
5. What are the consequences if Krisal
Enterprises fails to comply with MahaRERA's order? A: If Krisala Enterprises fails to comply with MahaRERA's order, they will face penal action under Section 63 of the RERA Act, which can include fines and other legal penalties.