Police Investigate Lawyer for Using Maharashtra Minister’s Official Residence in Property Notice

Published: June 12, 2026 | Category: Real Estate Maharashtra
Police Investigate Lawyer for Using Maharashtra Minister’s Official Residence in Property Notice

A property-related public notice published in newspapers has sparked a legal controversy after it allegedly carried the official residential address of Maharashtra minister Shri Chhagan Bhujbal. This has led to police action against a lawyer associated with the publication. The incident has drawn attention to the use of government addresses in private legal and real estate matters.

According to officials, the matter surfaced after the office of Shri Chhagan Bhujbal approached the Malabar Hill Police Station. They alleged that the address of the minister's official government residence, the 'Satpuda' bungalow, had been used in connection with a public notice concerning a private cluster redevelopment project in Mumbai's Girgaon locality. The office contended that the address was included without authorization and could create confusion regarding the matter.

The public notice was reportedly issued in relation to a stalled cluster development project involving privately owned properties. Such notices are generally published to inform stakeholders, claimants, or interested parties about legal or redevelopment proceedings. However, the inclusion of the minister's official residence became the focal point of the complaint.

Following the complaint, police registered a non-cognisable case against the lawyer concerned. Under such proceedings, the police can record the complaint and conduct preliminary action, while any detailed investigation or further legal process is carried out in accordance with applicable laws and judicial procedures.

Authorities are expected to examine the circumstances under which the official address was mentioned and determine whether there was any legitimate basis or authorization for its inclusion in the notice. The inquiry will also assess whether the use of the government residence could potentially mislead members of the public or parties connected with the redevelopment project.

The episode highlights the importance of accuracy and due diligence in public notices related to property transactions and redevelopment projects. In cities like Mumbai, where complex ownership structures and cluster redevelopment initiatives often involve multiple stakeholders, incorrect or disputed information in such notices can result in legal disputes and administrative scrutiny.

While the underlying redevelopment project remains a separate issue, the current proceedings are confined to the alleged use of the official residential address of Shri Chhagan Bhujbal in the published notice. Police have initiated the necessary inquiry, and any further action will depend on the findings of the investigation.

Stay Updated with GeoSquare WhatsApp Channels

Get the latest real estate news, market insights, auctions, and project updates delivered directly to your WhatsApp. No spam, only high-value alerts.

GeoSquare Real Estate News WhatsApp Channel Preview

Never Miss a Real Estate News Update — Get Daily, High-Value Alerts on WhatsApp!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What triggered the legal controversy?
The controversy was triggered by a public notice published in newspapers that allegedly used the official residential address of Maharashtra minister Shri Chhagan Bhujbal without authorization.
2. What action did the police take?
The police registered a non-cognisable case against the lawyer associated with the publication of the notice. This allows the police to record the complaint and conduct preliminary action.
3. What is the purpose of
public notice in property transactions? A: Public notices in property transactions are generally published to inform stakeholders, claimants, or interested parties about legal or redevelopment proceedings, ensuring transparency and awareness.
4. Why is the use of government addresses in private matters problematic?
The use of government addresses in private matters without authorization can create confusion, mislead the public, and potentially lead to legal disputes and administrative scrutiny.
5. What are the next steps in the investigation?
The next steps involve examining the circumstances under which the official address was mentioned, determining if there was any legitimate basis for its inclusion, and assessing the potential impact on the public and stakeholders.