Proposed IBC Amendments Boost Recovery Rates, But Real Estate Sector Still Faces Challenges: ICRA

Published: December 29, 2025 | Category: real estate news
Proposed IBC Amendments Boost Recovery Rates, But Real Estate Sector Still Faces Challenges: ICRA

Proposed IBC Amendments Boost Recovery Rates, But Real Estate Sector Still Faces Challenges: ICRA

New Delhi, Dec 29 (KNN) Credit rating agency ICRA has described the proposed amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as encouraging, noting that they could improve recovery rates and reduce resolution timelines. However, the agency cautioned that long-standing structural issues in the real estate sector remain unaddressed.

ICRA highlighted that the real estate and construction sector continues to account for the second-highest share of cases under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Despite government efforts to protect homebuyers and resolve stalled housing projects, the proposed amendments do not include sector-specific reforms. The agency warned that benefits from the changes are likely to accrue mainly to non-real estate cases, reported ANI.

Since its inception in October 2016, the IBC has facilitated recoveries of around Rs 4 lakh crore, outperforming other mechanisms. Yet, lenders continue to face steep haircuts, with average recoveries under successful resolution plans at 32 per cent of admitted claims through September 2025. ICRA noted a concerning trend: recovery timelines have lengthened, with nearly three-fourths of ongoing CIRP cases exceeding 270 days post-admission, far beyond the mandated period.

Delays at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) remain a significant bottleneck, particularly as over 30,000 cases were pending as of March 2025. At the current pace, clearing these cases could take more than a decade.

Among the notable amendments under consideration are group insolvency, cross-border insolvency, creditor-initiated insolvency, and allowing multiple or asset-wise resolution plans. ICRA said these could enhance outcomes, especially for companies with diversified operations. However, the agency emphasised that strengthening the capacity of NCLT and NCLAT will be crucial to translating these reforms into faster and more effective resolutions.

Manushree Saggar, Senior Vice President, ICRA, stated, “The SCLB recommendations, if passed, are expected to improve recovery rates and reduce timelines for the CIRP process under IBC.” However, delays at the NCLT continue to be a major bottleneck.

(KNN Bureau)

Stay Updated with GeoSquare WhatsApp Channels

Get the latest real estate news, market insights, auctions, and project updates delivered directly to your WhatsApp. No spam, only high-value alerts.

GeoSquare Real Estate News WhatsApp Channel Preview

Never Miss a Real Estate News Update — Get Daily, High-Value Alerts on WhatsApp!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the proposed amendments to the IBC?
The proposed amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) include group insolvency, cross-border insolvency, creditor-initiated insolvency, and allowing multiple or asset-wise resolution plans. These changes are aimed at improving recovery rates and reducing resolution timelines.
2. How has the IBC performed since its inception?
Since its inception in October 2016, the IBC has facilitated recoveries of around Rs 4 lakh crore, significantly outperforming other mechanisms. However, average recoveries under successful resolution plans are around 32 per cent of admitted claims.
3. What are the main challenges in the real estate sector under the IBC?
The real estate and construction sector continues to account for the second-highest share of cases under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Despite government efforts, structural issues in the sector remain unaddressed, and the proposed amendments do not include sector-specific reforms.
4. Why are recovery timelines lengthening under the IBC?
Recovery timelines have lengthened, with nearly three-fourths of ongoing CIRP cases exceeding 270 days post-admission. Delays at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) are a significant bottleneck, with over 30,000 cases pending as of March 2025.
5. What does ICR
suggest to improve the IBC process? A: ICRA suggests strengthening the capacity of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to translate the proposed reforms into faster and more effective resolutions.