Bombay High Court Halts Recovery Efforts in Tourism Policy Dispute
The Bombay High Court has temporarily halted the recovery of dues from a water park operator, providing interim relief against the revocation of a tax exemption under the 2006 Tourism Incentive Policy. This decision impacts investments in tourism and real estate across Maharashtra.
Bombay High CourtMaharashtra Real EstateTourism PolicyWater ParkGiriraj EnterprisesReal Estate MaharashtraJul 21, 2025
In a move that would impact investments into tourism and leisure-related real estate across Maharashtra, the Bombay High Court has paused recoveries tied to a key policy exemption. The ruling offers interim relief to the operator of a water park, whose tax exemption under the 2006 Tourism Incentive Policy was recently revoked by state authorities.
The Division Bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Y.G. Khobragade stayed the Collector’s order dated April 29, 2025, which had directed recovery proceedings. The outcome of this case could shape how tourism-linked real estate incentives are interpreted and applied under existing state policies.
The petition was filed by Giriraj Enterprises, which operates the water park at Shirdi in Maharashtra. The Collector’s order had sought recovery of Rs 5.77 crore, along with penalties, as arrears of land revenue. The order followed an audit objection raised by the Accountant General, which held that the project was not eligible for the entertainment duty exemption.
Appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Abhishek A Rastogi of Rastogi Chambers, submitted that the project had received an eligibility certificate from the Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation (MTDC) in 2010. The certificate, valid until June 2025, identified the project as a water park and entitled it to an entertainment duty exemption, subject to a monetary ceiling.
According to him, the petitioner had complied with the policy framework and that the retrospective withdrawal of the benefit created uncertainty for investors. The court noted that the eligibility certificate had remained unchallenged on its merits for over a decade and was being questioned only after the audit objection. It further observed that there had been no assessment under Section 4B of the Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act to determine whether the monetary exemption cap had been exceeded.
The court held that the Collector’s order did not constitute an order under Section 4B, which meant that the appellate remedy under Section 10A was not available. Accordingly, it allowed the writ petition to be entertained.
According to industry observers, the government-backed incentives are factored into financial models for tourism-related developments such as resorts, amusement parks, and integrated townships. Uncertainty around the interpretation of project classifications could influence investment decisions in this segment.
Rastogi stated that tourism-focused real estate projects depend on long-term policy continuity. According to him, the withdrawal of incentives after the issuance of statutory certificates may affect developer confidence and investment flows.
The next hearing is scheduled for August 26. Stakeholders in tourism and real estate are expected to track the proceedings given the potential implications for policy enforcement.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main issue in the dispute between Giriraj Enterprises and the state authorities?
The main issue is the eligibility of Giriraj Enterprises' water park for entertainment duty exemptions under the 2006 Tourism Incentive Policy. The state authorities had revoked the exemption, leading to recovery proceedings.
What did the Bombay High Court decide in this case?
The Bombay High Court has temporarily halted the recovery of dues from Giriraj Enterprises, providing interim relief against the revocation of the tax exemption under the 2006 Tourism Incentive Policy.
What is the significance of the eligibility certificate issued by the MTDC?
The eligibility certificate issued by the MTDC in 2010 identified the project as a water park and entitled it to an entertainment duty exemption, subject to a monetary ceiling. This certificate had remained unchallenged for over a decade.
How does this ruling impact investments in tourism and real estate in Maharashtra?
The ruling provides interim relief and reduces uncertainty for investors in tourism and real estate projects. It highlights the importance of long-term policy continuity and the potential implications of retrospective policy changes.
What is the next step in the legal proceedings?
The next hearing is scheduled for August 26. Stakeholders in tourism and real estate are expected to track the proceedings given the potential implications for policy enforcement.
Related News Articles
Budget 2024: Reviving Affordable Housing - A Sector in Crisis
The real estate sector is seeking 'high-impact' measures to revive affordable housing, including special schemes, tax breaks, and revised pricing definitions.
India Emerges as a Real Estate Powerhouse in Asia
India's real estate sector is witnessing unprecedented growth, with the total valuation of top 100 realty companies reaching Rs 14.2 trillion, a report reveals.
K-Better Homes: Redefining Luxury with Ethical Living in Pune
K-Better Homes, a brand under the Tayal Corp in Pune, is revolutionizing the real estate market with its commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. Emphasizing social consciousness, this brand is setting new standards in luxury living.
India's Home Sales Surge by 11% to Reach an All-Time High in 2024
The Indian real estate market witnessed a significant boost with home sales increasing by 11% to a record high of 3.03 lakh units in 2024. Key factors driving this growth include the expansion of the tech industry and favorable conditions in cities like B
Union Budget 2025-26: Varied Opinions from Real Estate Experts
The Union Budget 2025-26 has drawn mixed reactions from the real estate industry, with experts divided on the implications for the sector.
Maximizing Returns: 11-Year Performance Analysis of Equity, Debt, and Real Estate
Discover which asset class—equity, debt, or real estate—has provided the highest returns over the past 11 years. This comprehensive analysis helps investors make informed decisions.