Bombay High Court Rules Absence of Certificate Under MahaRERA Does Not Bar Execution Application
The Bombay High Court has clarified that the absence of a certificate under Rule 4 of the MahaRERA Rules, 2017, does not bar the maintainability of an execution application. This decision ensures that the rights of real estate purchasers are protected and upheld.
MahareraReal EstateBombay High CourtExecution ApplicationRule 4Real Estate MaharashtraJul 23, 2025
Justice Gauri Godse was hearing a challenge to a civil court's order rejecting the petitioner's application for execution of a MahaRERA order granting possession of a real estate unit. The execution application had been returned on the ground that it was not accompanied by the certificate as contemplated under Rule 4 of the MahaRERA Rules, 2017.
The Respondent contended that the prescribed procedure must be followed as per the statute. Non-compliance with issuing the necessary certificate, as contemplated under Rule 4 of the 2017 Rules, would not confer any jurisdiction on the civil court to implement the order.
Rejecting this argument, the Court held:
“… the object of this Rule is to ensure that the directions for handing over possession are executed by the civil court within whose jurisdiction the project is situated. Thus, this is a beneficial Rule to implement the orders passed under the provisions of RERA. In the present case, the absence of a certificate cannot be interpreted as an impediment to maintaining an execution application before the civil court for executing the order of possession.”
The Court noted the doctrine of substantial compliance, emphasizing that the procedure is a handmaiden to justice and should never be made a tool to deny justice or perpetuate injustice.
The Court observed that the absence of a formal Rule 4 certificate would not defeat an otherwise maintainable execution proceeding, where the division bench had issued directions to execute the order in an expeditious manner.
Exemplary Cost
The Court remarked that keeping the execution proceedings pending and depriving the purchasers of possession despite the order passed by the RERA Authority amounts to defeating the true spirit and object of RERA. This is for the benefit of the purchasers who are deprived of getting possession despite the agreed terms and conditions for handing over possession on a particular date. Hence, the Court imposed exemplary costs on the developer. It observed:
“… the conduct on the part of the developer in keeping the petition pending and seeking interim protection… by suppressing the correct facts before the coordinate bench warrants imposition of costs for making misleading and incorrect statements.”
Accordingly, the High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order of the District Judge, and directed the Executing Court to proceed with the execution of the MahaRERA order in accordance with the law.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the significance of Rule 4 under MahaRERA Rules, 2017?
Rule 4 of the MahaRERA Rules, 2017, is intended to ensure that the directions for handing over possession of a real estate unit are executed by the civil court within whose jurisdiction the project is situated. It is a beneficial rule to implement orders passed under RERA.
What did the Bombay High Court rule regarding the absence of a certificate under Rule 4?
The Bombay High Court ruled that the absence of a certificate under Rule 4 of the MahaRERA Rules, 2017, does not bar the maintainability of an execution application. The Court emphasized the doctrine of substantial compliance.
Why did the Court impose exemplary costs on the developer?
The Court imposed exemplary costs on the developer because keeping the execution proceedings pending and seeking interim protection by suppressing the correct facts before the coordinate bench warranted such costs for making misleading and incorrect statements.
What is the primary objective of the MahaRERA Rules, 2017?
The primary objective of the MahaRERA Rules, 2017, is to protect the rights of real estate purchasers and ensure that the directions for handing over possession are executed in a timely and fair manner by the civil courts.
What was the outcome of the petition in the Bombay High Court?
The Bombay High Court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order of the District Judge, and directed the Executing Court to proceed with the execution of the MahaRERA order in accordance with the law.
Related News Articles
Mumbai's Residential Market Set to Soar: ₹2 Lakh Crore in Sales by 2030
Mumbai's residential market is expected to exceed ₹2 lakh crore in sales by 2030, driven by improved connectivity and infrastructure development, reports JLL. The city's residential sales value is anticipated to surpass ₹1.35 lakh crore in 2024.
Adani Realty Eyes Stake in Emaar India: A Strategic Move to Expand Presence in Indian Real Estate Market
Adani Realty, led by business tycoon Gautam Adani, is in talks to acquire a stake in Emaar India, a leading player in the country's commercial and residential real estate market.
Pune Real Estate Market: Lodha Group Acquires 2.82-Acre Land for ₹110 Crore in Hinjawadi
Mumbai-based real estate developer Macrotech Developers, commonly known as Lodha Group, has made a significant acquisition by purchasing a 2.82-acre land parcel in the Hinjawadi area of Pune for ₹110 crore. This move underscores the growing interest and i
MahaRERA Examiner: 89% of Real Estate Agents Pass Competency Test
In a significant development, 6,755 out of 7,624 candidates have successfully cleared the MahaRERA real estate agent competency examination. The authority has made it mandatory for agents to pass this test to maintain their registration.
Bengaluru's Real Estate Market Struggles with IT Layoffs and AI Surge
The real estate market in Bengaluru, heavily reliant on the IT sector, is facing significant challenges due to recent layoffs and the growing influence of artificial intelligence. This article explores the impact of these changes on the city's property va
Lodha vs Lodha: A Peaceful Resolution to a Longstanding Real Estate Dispute
After years of legal battles, the Lodha brothers have finally reached an amicable agreement, marking the end of a long and contentious dispute over their real estate empire.