Bombay High Court Rules: Larger Flats Must Pay Higher Maintenance Charges
The Bombay High Court has ruled that owners of larger flats must pay higher maintenance charges, as per the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970. This decision clarifies the long-standing confusion over maintenance charge distribution in housing complexes.
Bombay High CourtMaintenance ChargesMaharashtra Apartment Ownership ActTreasure ParkFlat OwnersReal Estate MaharashtraAug 08, 2025
The condominium’s managing body had initially passed a resolution to levy equal maintenance charges on all flat owners, irrespective of apartment size. However, owners of smaller flats challenged this decision in 2022, arguing that it violated the law. According to the law, maintenance costs must be shared based on each owner’s undivided share of the common areas, which is determined by the size of the apartment.
The deputy registrar of co-operative societies agreed with the smaller flat owners and ordered the condominium to charge maintenance fees proportionally. Owners of larger flats, unhappy with this order, first approached the Co-operative Court in Pune, but their case was dismissed in May 2022. They then moved to the Bombay HC, where they argued that maintenance is used for common areas and amenities used equally by all residents, and that assuming bigger flats have more residents and therefore must pay more is unfair.
The Bombay HC, however, disagreed with the flat owners of larger flats who challenged the Co-operative Court of Pune. Justice Milind Jadhav stated that both the law and the condominium’s own declaration documents support proportionate maintenance based on apartment size. Dismissing the petition, the court ruled that flat owners with larger homes must pay a larger share of the maintenance costs, as they hold a greater undivided interest in the common areas.
According to legal experts, the confusion among flat owners in Maharashtra stems from the absence of a uniform law governing maintenance charges, with multiple regulatory mechanisms in place. Experts advise that the first step is for apartment owners to determine whether their building is registered under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 (MAOA) or a different framework.
'The provisions of the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 (MAOA) and covenants in the Deed of Declaration apply to the apartment owners in a condominium set up under the MAOA, 1970. As per the Bombay High Court ruling, in a condominium set up, an apartment owner who holds a higher proportionate value and size (area) of their apartments must contribute to common area maintenance charges proportionately,' said Trupti Daphtary, an advocate and solicitor based in Mumbai.
In contrast, for members of a housing society, it is the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) that apply. In 2002, the Bombay High Court, in the case of Venus Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Dr. J.Y. Detwani, ruled that there is no rational basis for a co-operative society to levy maintenance charges based on the size of the flats. However, the Model Bye-law for the co-operative housing societies in Maharashtra has a provision for repairs and maintenance charges to be levied on members, and certain charges could vary based on flat area.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Bombay High Court's ruling on maintenance charges?
The Bombay High Court ruled that owners of larger flats must pay higher maintenance charges, as per the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970.
Why did the dispute arise at Treasure Park?
The dispute arose because the condominium’s managing body initially passed a resolution to levy equal maintenance charges on all flat owners, regardless of apartment size, which was challenged by owners of smaller flats.
What did the deputy registrar of co-operative societies decide?
The deputy registrar of co-operative societies agreed with the smaller flat owners and ordered the condominium to charge maintenance fees proportionally based on apartment size.
What is the significance of the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970?
The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, governs the distribution of maintenance charges based on each owner’s undivided share of the common areas, which is determined by the size of the apartment.
How do the provisions for maintenance charges differ between condominiums and housing societies in Maharashtra?
For condominiums under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, maintenance charges are based on apartment size. For housing societies under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, there is no rational basis for levying charges based on flat size, but certain charges can vary based on flat area.
Tags:
Related News Articles
Mumbai's Sky-High Ambitions: Exploring the City's Love for Skyscrapers
As Mumbai continues to grow
Mumbai Records Third-Highest Surge in Luxury Housing Prices Globally
Mumbai's prime residential prices surge 11.5% year-on-year, ranking third globally, as India's economic growth drives demand in luxury housing market.
Affordable Housing Supply Dries Up as Builders Focus on Premium Projects
The latest data from JLL India reveals a 21% decline in affordable housing supply below Rs 50 lakh, while premium projects saw a significant surge in demand.
Priyanka Chopra's Real Estate Empire: A Peek into Her Investments
Priyanka Chopra Jonas is a keen investor in the real estate space, owning multiple properties in India and the US. Here's a look at her recent transactions.
Uber and Heads Up for Tails Expand Pet-Friendly Rides in Delhi and Mumbai
Uber has partnered with Heads Up for Tails to offer pet-friendly rides in Delhi and Mumbai, making travel more convenient and comfortable for pet owners.
Blackstone and Sattva-backed REIT Files Draft Papers for ₹7000 Cr IPO
A real estate investment trust (REIT) backed by asset manager Blackstone Group and Bengaluru developer Sattva Group has filed its draft papers with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for a ₹7000 crore initial public offering (IPO).