Bombay High Court Rules Larger Flats Must Pay Higher Maintenance Fees

The Bombay High Court has clarified that flat owners with larger apartments in Maharashtra’s condominiums must pay higher maintenance charges, in line with the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970. This ruling brings clarity to ongoing disputes over maintenance fees.

Bombay High CourtMaharashtra Apartment Ownership ActMaintenance FeesTreasure ParkProportional ChargesReal Estate MaharashtraAug 17, 2025

Bombay High Court Rules Larger Flats Must Pay Higher Maintenance Fees
Real Estate Maharashtra:The Bombay High Court has ruled that flat owners with larger apartments in Maharashtra’s apartment condominiums must pay higher maintenance charges, in line with the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970. The judgment clarifies the distinction between the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971 and the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, which determine how maintenance is calculated. Under the 1971 Act, common in co-operative housing societies, maintenance is usually charged equally per flat. However, under the 1970 Act, applicable to apartment-condominiums, charges must be proportional to the carpet area of each unit, as owners hold an undivided share in the common property.

The case arose from a dispute in Treasure Park, a Pune residential complex with 356 flats in 11 buildings. In 2022, its managing body resolved to collect equal maintenance from all owners, regardless of flat size. Owners of smaller flats challenged this, arguing it violated the law, which mandates that maintenance costs be shared according to each owner’s share in the common areas—linked directly to the apartment size. The deputy registrar of co-operative societies agreed with them, ordering proportional fees.

Larger flat owners contested the order before the Co-operative Court in Pune, which dismissed their plea in May 2022. They then approached the Bombay High Court, claiming maintenance funds were for equally used common areas and that assuming larger flats house more residents—and therefore must pay more—was unfair.

Justice Milind Jadhav rejected this argument, citing both the Act and the condominium’s declaration, which require proportionate charges. He emphasised that larger units have a greater undivided interest in the property’s land and amenities, justifying higher contributions.

The ruling reinforces that under the 1970 Act, apartment owners are co-owners of the land and common areas, unlike under the 1971 Act where ownership is limited to individual units with access to shared facilities. The judgment ensures that maintenance costs reflect property size and ownership share, bringing clarity to disputes over charges in Maharashtra’s apartment complexes.

In summary, the Bombay High Court ruled that larger apartment owners in Maharashtra condominiums must pay higher maintenance under the 1970 Act, which bases charges on carpet area. In a Pune dispute, smaller flat owners won against equal fees, with the court affirming proportional charges to reflect ownership share in common property.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970?

The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, governs the ownership and management of apartment condominiums in Maharashtra. It mandates that maintenance charges be proportional to the carpet area of each unit, reflecting each owner’s share in the common property.

Why did the Bombay High Court rule in favor of proportional maintenance charges?

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of proportional maintenance charges because the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, requires maintenance fees to be based on the carpet area of each unit. Larger units have a greater undivided interest in the property’s land and amenities, justifying higher contributions.

What was the dispute in Treasure Park about?

The dispute in Treasure Park, a Pune residential complex, was about whether maintenance fees should be charged equally for all flats or proportionally based on the carpet area. Smaller flat owners argued for proportional charges, which the court ultimately upheld.

What is the main difference between the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971, and the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970?

The main difference is that under the 1971 Act, maintenance is usually charged equally per flat, while under the 1970 Act, charges are proportional to the carpet area of each unit. The 1970 Act treats apartment owners as co-owners of the land and common areas.

How does this ruling affect apartment owners in Maharashtra?

This ruling ensures that maintenance costs in Maharashtra’s apartment complexes reflect property size and ownership share. Larger apartment owners must pay higher maintenance fees, bringing clarity to disputes over charges and ensuring fair distribution of costs.

Related News Articles

Mumbai's Sky-High Ambitions: Exploring the City's Love for Skyscrapers
Real Estate Mumbai

Mumbai's Sky-High Ambitions: Exploring the City's Love for Skyscrapers

As Mumbai continues to grow

May 30, 2024
Read Article
Mumbai Records Third-Highest Surge in Luxury Housing Prices Globally
real estate news

Mumbai Records Third-Highest Surge in Luxury Housing Prices Globally

Mumbai's prime residential prices surge 11.5% year-on-year, ranking third globally, as India's economic growth drives demand in luxury housing market.

June 29, 2024
Read Article
Affordable Housing Supply Dries Up as Builders Focus on Premium Projects
real estate news

Affordable Housing Supply Dries Up as Builders Focus on Premium Projects

The latest data from JLL India reveals a 21% decline in affordable housing supply below Rs 50 lakh, while premium projects saw a significant surge in demand.

July 15, 2024
Read Article
Priyanka Chopra's Real Estate Empire: A Peek into Her Investments
Real Estate Mumbai

Priyanka Chopra's Real Estate Empire: A Peek into Her Investments

Priyanka Chopra Jonas is a keen investor in the real estate space, owning multiple properties in India and the US. Here's a look at her recent transactions.

July 18, 2024
Read Article
Uber and Heads Up for Tails Expand Pet-Friendly Rides in Delhi and Mumbai
Real Estate Mumbai

Uber and Heads Up for Tails Expand Pet-Friendly Rides in Delhi and Mumbai

Uber has partnered with Heads Up for Tails to offer pet-friendly rides in Delhi and Mumbai, making travel more convenient and comfortable for pet owners.

March 7, 2025
Read Article
Blackstone and Sattva-backed REIT Files Draft Papers for ₹7000 Cr IPO
Real Estate

Blackstone and Sattva-backed REIT Files Draft Papers for ₹7000 Cr IPO

A real estate investment trust (REIT) backed by asset manager Blackstone Group and Bengaluru developer Sattva Group has filed its draft papers with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for a ₹7000 crore initial public offering (IPO).

March 7, 2025
Read Article