Consumer Court Rejects Religious Sentiment Claim Against Non-Veg Food Delivery
A Mumbai consumer court has dismissed a claim by two vegetarians who alleged that their religious sentiments were hurt after receiving chicken momos from a popular restaurant, 'Wow Momo'. The court questioned why they ordered from a restaurant that serves both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food.
Consumer CourtVegetarianNonvegetarianReligious SentimentsCompensationReal Estate NewsJun 08, 2025
A coram of President Pradeep Kadu and Member Gauri Kapse of the Mumbai Suburban Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission noted that the applicants claimed they ordered 'Veg Steam Darjeeling Momo' along with a Pepsi, but received chicken momos, leading to emotional distress, mental trauma, and hurt religious sentiments. The applicants demanded Rs 6 lakhs as compensation.
However, the coram observed that the applicants failed to substantiate their claims of performing any Pooja (rituals) while they ordered the food and then received non-veg food. They did not provide names of any Pandit or Poojari who performed the Pooja, nor did they disclose the nature, name, date, and place of the religious ceremonies.
The court stated, 'If the Complainants were strictly vegetarian and the non-veg food hurts their religious sentiments, then, why they opted to order the food items from the restaurant which was delivering both non-veg and vegetarian food instead of ordering the food from a restaurant which was exclusively vegetarian, and served only and only vegetarian food.'
Furthermore, the coram noted that the applicants failed to produce any evidence that they had only ordered veg momos and not chicken ones. The invoice of their order indicated that they ordered chicken momos. The applicants had alleged that they twice instructed one of the representatives of Wow Momo to ensure that they send only veg momos, but this contention could not be substantiated.
The Veg and Non-veg momos prices are the same. The Complainants produced 2-3 photos of the dish, but the court could not determine if they were veg or non-veg momos. No inference could be drawn in view of the fact that the Complainants failed to prove that on the given date, a non-veg order had been delivered to them instead of a veg order.
In its six-page order, authored by Member Kapse, the coram stated, 'If non-veg order had been delivered to the Complainants instead of veg order, then, it ought to have contained only and only non-veg pieces therein. A prudent person would be able to distinguish between veg and non-veg food before consuming it seems reasonable.'
The applicants produced a photo of the offer board which didn't clearly indicate whether the Steam Darjeeling Momo (1 plate) + Pepsi was veg or non-veg. However, the board did mention 'veg/non-veg' at the bottom, suggesting that the restaurant provided some indication of the food type. This could imply that the Complainants should have been aware of the possibility of both veg and non-veg options being available.
With these observations, the coram held that the applicants failed to point out any negligence in the service of Wow Momo and therefore dismissed the complaint.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the main issue in the complaint against Wow Momo?
The main issue was that two vegetarians claimed their religious sentiments were hurt after receiving chicken momos instead of the vegetarian momos they ordered.
Why did the consumer court reject the complaint?
The court rejected the complaint because the applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence and could not substantiate their claims of religious distress.
What did the offer board at Wow Momo indicate?
The offer board mentioned 'veg/non-veg' at the bottom, suggesting that the restaurant provided some indication of the food type available.
How much compensation did the applicants demand?
The applicants demanded Rs 6 lakhs as compensation for their alleged distress and hurt religious sentiments.
What was the court's final decision in the case?
The court dismissed the complaint, holding that the applicants failed to prove any negligence on the part of Wow Momo.
Related News Articles
Maharashtra's Real Estate Market Sees Upsurge in Property Registrations
Maharashtra's real estate market experiences a boost in property registrations and revenue despite unchanged RR rates, indicating a shift towards high-value transactions.
Top Stock Picks for Short-Term Gains: Bajaj Finserv, HDFC Life, HDFC Bank, and LIC Housing Finance
Market tech analysts Soni Patnaik, Mitessh Thakkar, and F&O analyst Rajesh Palviya recommend these stocks for short-term gains.
3 Financial Stocks Show Promise, Real Estate Overhyped: Samir Arora
Samir Arora, Founder of Helios Capital, highlights the potential of some NBFCs and microfinance companies, while expressing concerns about the real estate sector being overdone. He believes that HDFC Bank, Kotak Bank, and Bajaj Finance, which have underpe
NBT Office Relocation and Pune Book Festival Expected to Draw 7.5 Lakh Visitors
The National Book Trust (NBT) is set to shift its office to the city, a move that coincides with the highly anticipated Pune Book Festival. The festival, expected to attract 7.5 lakh visitors, is a significant cultural event that showcases a wide array of
Metro Brands Promoters Acquire Five Luxury Apartments in Mumbai's Worli for ₹405 Crore
The promoters of footwear retailer Metro Brands have made a significant investment in Mumbai's luxury real estate market by purchasing five apartments in the Worli area for ₹405 crore. These apartments are located in one of the city's tallest buildings, P
Maharashtra Real Estate: Majority of Developers Update Project Details for MahaRERA Compliance
A significant number of real estate developers in Maharashtra have taken steps to improve their compliance with the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) by updating their project details. This move reflects a growing commitment to trans