Consumer Court Rejects Religious Sentiment Claim Against Non-Veg Food Delivery
A Mumbai consumer court has dismissed a claim by two vegetarians who alleged that their religious sentiments were hurt after receiving chicken momos from a popular restaurant, 'Wow Momo'. The court questioned why they ordered from a restaurant that serves both vegetarian and non-vegetarian food.
Consumer CourtVegetarianNonvegetarianReligious SentimentsCompensationReal Estate NewsJun 08, 2025
A coram of President Pradeep Kadu and Member Gauri Kapse of the Mumbai Suburban Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission noted that the applicants claimed they ordered 'Veg Steam Darjeeling Momo' along with a Pepsi, but received chicken momos, leading to emotional distress, mental trauma, and hurt religious sentiments. The applicants demanded Rs 6 lakhs as compensation.
However, the coram observed that the applicants failed to substantiate their claims of performing any Pooja (rituals) while they ordered the food and then received non-veg food. They did not provide names of any Pandit or Poojari who performed the Pooja, nor did they disclose the nature, name, date, and place of the religious ceremonies.
The court stated, 'If the Complainants were strictly vegetarian and the non-veg food hurts their religious sentiments, then, why they opted to order the food items from the restaurant which was delivering both non-veg and vegetarian food instead of ordering the food from a restaurant which was exclusively vegetarian, and served only and only vegetarian food.'
Furthermore, the coram noted that the applicants failed to produce any evidence that they had only ordered veg momos and not chicken ones. The invoice of their order indicated that they ordered chicken momos. The applicants had alleged that they twice instructed one of the representatives of Wow Momo to ensure that they send only veg momos, but this contention could not be substantiated.
The Veg and Non-veg momos prices are the same. The Complainants produced 2-3 photos of the dish, but the court could not determine if they were veg or non-veg momos. No inference could be drawn in view of the fact that the Complainants failed to prove that on the given date, a non-veg order had been delivered to them instead of a veg order.
In its six-page order, authored by Member Kapse, the coram stated, 'If non-veg order had been delivered to the Complainants instead of veg order, then, it ought to have contained only and only non-veg pieces therein. A prudent person would be able to distinguish between veg and non-veg food before consuming it seems reasonable.'
The applicants produced a photo of the offer board which didn't clearly indicate whether the Steam Darjeeling Momo (1 plate) + Pepsi was veg or non-veg. However, the board did mention 'veg/non-veg' at the bottom, suggesting that the restaurant provided some indication of the food type. This could imply that the Complainants should have been aware of the possibility of both veg and non-veg options being available.
With these observations, the coram held that the applicants failed to point out any negligence in the service of Wow Momo and therefore dismissed the complaint.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the main issue in the complaint against Wow Momo?
The main issue was that two vegetarians claimed their religious sentiments were hurt after receiving chicken momos instead of the vegetarian momos they ordered.
Why did the consumer court reject the complaint?
The court rejected the complaint because the applicants failed to provide sufficient evidence and could not substantiate their claims of religious distress.
What did the offer board at Wow Momo indicate?
The offer board mentioned 'veg/non-veg' at the bottom, suggesting that the restaurant provided some indication of the food type available.
How much compensation did the applicants demand?
The applicants demanded Rs 6 lakhs as compensation for their alleged distress and hurt religious sentiments.
What was the court's final decision in the case?
The court dismissed the complaint, holding that the applicants failed to prove any negligence on the part of Wow Momo.
Related News Articles
Pune Real Estate Market Sees 25% YoY Increase in Property Registrations
The Pune real estate market saw a significant boost in July 2024, with a 25% year-on-year increase in property registrations, driven by mid and premium options.
Real Estate vs Mutual Funds: Which Investment Avenue Should You Choose?
Investing in real estate or mutual funds requires careful consideration of market conditions, tax implications, and personal risk profiles.
Maharashtra: A Powerhouse of Business at the World Economic Forum
Maharashtra's robust economy, infrastructure, and dynamic policies make it a prime destination for global investments. The state is set to drive India's economic growth on the global stage, especially at the World Economic Forum.
The Most Valuable Virtual Real Estate in the Metaverse
Discover the future of virtual real estate in the metaverse, where NFTs and blockchain technology are transforming the way virtual properties are bought, sold, and monetized.
Shah Rukh Khan Secures Major Victory in ITAT Ruling: A Deep Dive into Foreign Tax Credit
Shah Rukh Khan, one of Bollywood's most prominent stars, has emerged victorious in a significant ITAT ruling. This article delves into the details of the ruling and explains the implications of foreign tax credit for Indian celebrities and businesses.
Understanding the Impact of Maharashtra’s New Ready Reckoner Rates on Real Estate
Pune, 1st April 2025: The recent increase in Maharashtra’s Ready Reckoner rates has sparked significant discussions in the real estate sector. Managing Director of Gera Developments, Rohit Gera, shares his insights on how these changes will affect the market and what buyers and developers can expect.