Court Upholds Unilateral Deemed Conveyance in Kharghar Land Dispute
This legal dispute involves Balaji Corporation
Real EstateConstructionDispute ResolutionMaharashtra Ownership Flats ActReraReal Estate NewsMay 30, 2024
The parties involved in this dispute are Balaji Corporation, a partnership firm, Delta Central Cooperative Housing Society (Respondent No. 1), registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; CIDCO, a public sector undertaking, and the New Town Development Authority designated by the Government of Maharashtra (Respondent No. 2); and the Competent Authority under MOFA, responsible for issuing the contested order (Respondent No. 3).
CIDCO leased Plot No. 4 in Sector 23 of Village Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, measuring 8694.03 square meters (Land), to Balaji Corporation. Balaji Corporation began developing the 'Delta Central' project, which included Wings A, B, C, and D. Initial building plan approvals were obtained on April 27, 2017, with revisions and final approvals granted on December 24, 2018, and March 25, 2019.
Balaji Corporation's Expansion Plans
Balaji Corporation started development with limited utilization of the Floor Space Index (FSI). Ambitious plans soon followed, proposing the construction of Wing E and a Club House. An updated plan for Wing E and additional floors for Wing C received a no-objection certificate on October 11, 2021, and an occupancy certificate on October 29, 2021. Subsequently, individual flat purchasers formed the Society, registered on August 29, 2023.
Conflict
The Society requested conveyance of the Land from Balaji Corporation, which insisted on completing Wing E and additional floors in Wing C before executing the conveyance. The Society sought unilateral deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA, which was granted by the Competent Authority, resulting in the conveyance of the Land.
Present Petition
Balaji Corporation contested the unilateral deemed conveyance order, leading to the filing of this writ petition.
Key Arguments
Balaji Corporation's Perspective:
* Lack of Detailed Reasoning: Counsel for Balaji Corporation argued that the contested order lacked detailed reasoning and did not fully consider Balaji Corporation's points.
* Rule 9 of the Maharashtra Real Estate (Regulation and Development) (Registration of real estate projects, Registration of real estate agents, rates of interests and disclosures on website) (Amendment) Rules, 2019 (RERA Rules): The counsel drew attention to Rule 9 of the RERA Rules, which states that deemed conveyance can only be sought after the final occupancy certificate for the last building or wing is issued.
* Illegality of Competent Authority's Order: The counsel contended that the order granting conveyance of the Land, including Wing E, was improper necessitating court intervention.
Society's Perspective:
* Adherence to Agreement : The Society's counsel supported the contested order, citing clauses in the agreement with flat purchasers that limited the project to four wings.
* Occupancy Certificate: The counsel mentioned that CIDCO issued an occupancy certificate on October 29, 2021, a fact acknowledged by Balaji Corporation, reinforcing the Society's right to conveyance.
* Legality of Competent Authority's Order: The counsel argued that Balaji Corporation had agreed to convey the entire Land, affirming the legality of the competent authority's order.
Prior Rulings
The Court referenced the following rulings:
* ACME Enterprises vs. Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies: This case highlighted the limited role of the competent authority in granting deemed conveyance The competent authority can only convey what the promoter agreed to in the original agreement.
* Mazda Construction Company & Others vs. Sultanabad Darshan CHS Ltd. & Others: The court emphasized that the authority's duty is to enforce the promoter's obligations if the promoter fails to do so, but not to extend beyond what was initially agreed upon.
Court's Order
The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the initial project was restricted to four wings and that Balaji Corporation's failure to execute the conveyance justified the unilateral deemed conveyance.
The court upheld the Competent Authority's decision and noted that Balaji Corporation could pursue a civil suit if it considers that its rights were affected.
Conclusion
This case underscores the legal responsibilities of Promoters and the rights of flat purchasers under MOFA and RERA. It highlights the Competent Authority's role in ensuring Promoters meet their conveyance obligations, safeguarding flat purchasers' interests. Importantly, it clarifies that deemed conveyance can only transfer the developer's legal rights, title, and interest in the property.
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co founded on a century of legal achievements, is one of India's leading full-service law firms. The Firm's mission is to enable business by providing solutions as trusted advisers through excellence, responsiveness, innovation and collaboration. SAM & Co is known globally for its exceptional practices in mergers & acquisitions, private equity, competition law, insolvency & bankruptcy, dispute resolution, capital markets, banking & finance and projects & infrastructure.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act 1963?
The Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act 1963 is a law that regulates the promotion construction sale management and transfer of flats in Maharashtra
What is unilateral deemed conveyance?
Unilateral deemed conveyance is a process where the Competent Authority grants conveyance of the land to the flat purchasers in case of a promoter's failure to execute the conveyance
What is the role of the Competent Authority under MOFA?
The Competent Authority is responsible for ensuring that promoters meet their conveyance obligations and safeguarding the interests of flat purchasers
What is the significance of the RERA Rules in this case?
The RERA Rules are relevant in this case as they provide guidelines for the registration of real estate projects registration of real estate agents rates of interest and disclosures on the website
What is the outcome of this court case?
The court upheld the Competent Authority's decision ruling that the initial project was restricted to four wings and that Balaji Corporation's failure to execute the conveyance justified the unilateral deemed conveyance
Related News Articles
Residential Real Estate in Delhi-NCR Sees Unprecedented Growth
The Delhi-NCR region has witnessed a remarkable 95% surge in new real estate launches in Q2 FY 2024, according to a recent PropEquity report.
The Rise of Sustainable Commercial Real Estate in India
Ashish Sharma, AVP Operations, Brahma Group, shares his insights on the growing trend of green commercial real estate in India.
MCB Real Estate Ups Bid for Whitestone REIT to a Staggering $1.45 Billion
Whitestone REIT's shares surged up to 7.9% following the news of MCB Real Estate's enhanced takeover bid.
Karnataka Takes the Lead with India's First Circular Economy Policy: Minister Priyank Kharge
Karnataka is set to become the first state in India to implement a circular economy policy, according to Priyank Kharge, the Minister for Information Technology & Biotechnology and Science and Technology. The policy aims to reduce waste through sustainabl
Maharashtra Proposes Single-Window Clearance for Affordable Housing Projects
The Maharashtra State Cooperative Housing Federation is advocating for a single-window clearance system in the new housing policy to streamline the approval process and enhance affordable housing development.
MahaRERA Freezes Accounts of 1,950 Stalled Real Estate Projects to Protect Buyers
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has frozen the bank accounts of more than 1,950 real estate projects to protect homebuyers from potential fraud and delays.