Delhi HC Rules EDC Payments to Haryana Development Board Not Rent
The Delhi High Court has ruled that External Development Charges (EDC) paid to the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) by real estate developers are not considered rent, and therefore, do not require Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) deduction.
EdcTdsReal EstateDelhi High CourtHudaReal EstateSep 26, 2025
The facts leading to the present appeal stem from an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO treated EDC paid by builders as rent under Section 194I, creating a demand of ₹1,13,50,000 and ₹1,08,96,000 under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) respectively, resulting in a cumulative demand of ₹2,22,46,000.
The Assessing Officer’s conclusion was based on a survey that showed EDC receipts by HUDA without TDS deduction. The assessee, SS Group Pvt. Ltd., challenged this order before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), which allowed the appeal relying on the decision of the Delhi High Court in DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) (2023). The ITAT upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the challenge by the Revenue.
Before the High Court, Vipul Agrawal, Sakashi Shairwal, Akshat Singh, Gaoraang Ranjan, and Harshita Kotru appeared for the Revenue and argued that Chapter XVII-B of the Income Tax Act imposes an express obligation to deduct tax at source on taxable payments. They contended that the matter warranted remand so the AO could determine whether provisions such as Section 194C or Section 194I were applicable in the present case. They placed reliance on the Delhi High Court ruling in Puri Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Addl. CIT & Ors. (2024) to contend that EDC payments could attract TDS under contractor provisions in appropriate circumstances.
Meanwhile, the respondent’s counsel, Puneet Agarwal, Yuvraj Singh, Mansi Khurana, Shruti Garg, and Chetan Kumar Shukla, relied on this Court’s earlier ruling in DLF Homes Panchkula and pointed to the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the Special Leave Petition (SLP) in Union of India v. M/s SS Group Pvt. Ltd. (2024) to submit that the position had attained finality between the parties.
The Division Bench of Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Vinod Kumar noted that the Assessing Officer had characterized the payment as rent under Section 194I but that the question of characterisation had been squarely considered by the Court in the batch of petitions including that of the present assessee. Noting that the contentions raised by the respondent’s position had been accepted in DLF Homes Panchkula (supra) and that the Supreme Court had declined special leave, the High Court found no merit in remanding the matter to the AO for a fresh adjudication.
Since no substantial question of law arose for consideration, the Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and affirmed that EDC payments to the Haryana development body do not require the real estate developer to deduct TDS.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is EDC in the context of real estate?
EDC stands for External Development Charges, which are fees paid by real estate developers to development authorities like HUDA for infrastructure and amenities.
Why did the Revenue argue that EDC should be treated as rent?
The Revenue argued that EDC payments could be considered rent under Section 194I of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore, required TDS deduction.
What was the basis for the assessee's appeal?
The assessee, SS Group Pvt. Ltd., relied on the Delhi High Court's decision in DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax (Osd) (2023) to argue that EDC is not rent and does not require TDS deduction.
What did the Delhi High Court decide?
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that EDC payments to HUDA are not rent and do not require TDS deduction.
What is the significance of this ruling for real estate developers?
This ruling clarifies that real estate developers do not need to deduct TDS on EDC payments to HUDA, potentially reducing their tax compliance burden.
Related News Articles
Luxury Redefined: Ceratec Group Unveils Presidential Towers in Ravet, Pune
Discover the epitome of luxury living with Ceratec Group's latest project, Presidential Towers, offering 2 and 3 BHK homes in the heart of Ravet, Pune.
Rexas Finance (RXS) Price Forecast: Will It Be a Top Performer in 2025?
Rexas Finance (RXS) is making waves in the financial sector with its innovative approach to asset management. From real estate to art and goods, RXS offers a user-friendly interface for seamless asset trading and management. This article explores the pote
Government Hikes: Ordinary Citizens Bear the Brunt in Karnataka
With a series of tax and price hikes, the Karnataka government is placing a significant financial burden on ordinary citizens. From fuel and liquor to milk and water, the costs are rising, while the government contemplates more increases in property tax,
Port Sector Development: Key Focus in My Third Term, Vadhavan Port Underway
In a significant push towards infrastructure development, the port sector has emerged as a key focus area in my third term. The work on the Vadhavan port has already begun, marking a crucial milestone in this initiative.
Women Lead the Charge in India's Real Estate Market
Women investors are increasingly making their mark in both residential and commercial real estate in India, shattering traditional gender barriers and driving market growth.
Housing Loans Reach ₹33.53 Trillion in Q2FY25: NHB
The National Housing Bank (NHB) reports that housing loans outstanding have reached ₹33.53 trillion in the second quarter of FY25, signaling a promising outlook for the housing sector.