Delhi High Court Rules GST Evasion Informer Has No Right to Claim Reward

The Delhi High Court has ruled that individuals providing information about alleged GST evasion have no legal right to claim a reward, as the grant is at the discretion of the CBIC.

GstCbicDelhi High CourtTax EvasionInformer RewardReal EstateNov 08, 2025

Delhi High Court Rules GST Evasion Informer Has No Right to Claim Reward
Real Estate:The Delhi High Court recently affirmed that any person who furnishes information about alleged Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion cannot claim a reward as a matter of right. The Court noted that any reward is a discretionary grant by the Revenue.

The petitioner, referred to as “XY,” filed the instant petition claiming that she had supplied information concerning alleged GST evasion by one M/s Shakti Enterprises and was not considered for a reward under a Notification dated July 31, 2015, issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs (Anti Smuggling Unit), which has been reconstituted and renamed as the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) since 2017.

Following the provision of the information, a show-cause notice was issued to M/s Shakti Enterprises on July 28, 2023, which culminated in an order-in-original dated December 6, 2023, by which substantial demands were raised and penalties imposed. The order-in-appeal was challenged, with the appellate authority setting aside penalties against the partners and leaving only a small demand. Aggrieved by the modification of the penalty and non-grant of a reward, the petitioner approached the High Court.

Gaurav Sharma and Manpreet Kour appeared for the Respondent Union of India, with Samiksha Godiyal, Tenzing N. Bhutia, and B.D. Rao Kundan for the Revenue, relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. v. C Krishna Reddy (2003) to argue that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued at the behest of an informer.

A Division Bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain at the outset queried the maintainability of the writ, noting that the petitioner’s status is that of an informer and that an informer cannot convert a claim to a discretionary award into a lis (Latin for a legal dispute or litigation) against the private respondent on merits. Accordingly, the Bench observed that the grant of an award under the scheme initiated by the CBEC is a discretionary grant and prima facie not amenable to challenge as a legal entitlement.

Kumar Utkarsh appeared for the petitioner and pointed out that there is a list of a large number of clients of M/s Shakti Enterprises who had deposited Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) and the taxable value has been wrongly taken by the Department, leading to a small demand being raised in the order-in-appeal passed on 15th July, 2024.

Accordingly, the High Court directed the informer to remain present during the next date of hearing and required the parties to be ready to address the issue of maintainability of the matter. The Court also directed that a properly notarised affidavit containing the petitioner’s full particulars be retained in a sealed cover by the Registry.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC)?

The CBIC is responsible for the administration of indirect taxes in India, including Goods and Services Tax (GST). It also handles customs and excise duties.

Can an informer claim a reward for providing information about GST evasion?

No, an informer cannot claim a reward as a legal right. The grant of a reward is at the discretion of the CBIC and is not a legal entitlement.

What happened in the case of XY vs Union of India?

XY, an informer, filed a petition claiming a reward for providing information about alleged GST evasion by M/s Shakti Enterprises. The Delhi High Court ruled that the grant of a reward is discretionary and not a legal right.

What is a writ of mandamus?

A writ of mandamus is an order from a court to an inferior court or a public authority to perform a public duty. It cannot be issued at the behest of an informer to claim a discretionary award.

What is the significance of the Supreme Court decision in Union of India & Ors. v. C Krishna Reddy?

The Supreme Court decision in Union of India & Ors. v. C Krishna Reddy (2003) established that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued at the behest of an informer to claim a discretionary award.

Related News Articles

Residential Housing Demand Surges in Tier II Cities, Sales Up 11% in FY24
real estate news

Residential Housing Demand Surges in Tier II Cities, Sales Up 11% in FY24

Real estate data analytics firm PropEquity reveals that housing sales in top 30 Tier II cities increased by 11% in FY24, driven by lower property prices and growth potential.

July 6, 2024
Read Article
Union Budget 2024-25: Real Estate Sector's Expectations for Growth and Stability
Real Estate Maharashtra

Union Budget 2024-25: Real Estate Sector's Expectations for Growth and Stability

Industry leaders highlight the need for enhanced tax incentives, simplified project approvals, and incentives for affordable housing to drive growth and stability in the real estate sector.

July 11, 2024
Read Article
Air India's Real Estate Sell-Off Fails to Take Flight
Real Estate Pune

Air India's Real Estate Sell-Off Fails to Take Flight

Air India's attempt to sell 56 properties across India has been met with little interest, with less than 10 properties sold so far.

July 13, 2024
Read Article
Hyderabad Police Commissioner CV Anand Hears Major Political Rivalry Case
Real Estate Maharashtra

Hyderabad Police Commissioner CV Anand Hears Major Political Rivalry Case

City Police Commissioner and Additional District Magistrate, CV Anand, held a court session to address the longstanding political rivalry between Nampally MLA Mohd. Majid Hussain and MLA contestant Mohd. Feroz Khan.

October 24, 2024
Read Article
The Future of Urban Living: Insights into Real Estate Development in India
Real Estate Mumbai

The Future of Urban Living: Insights into Real Estate Development in India

In major cities like Mumbai, the increasing demand for properties is significantly driving up prices per square foot. Community living is becoming more important as urban areas continue to grow.

October 29, 2024
Read Article
Delhi-NCR Office Rent Soars to Rs 340/Sq Ft, Making It 6th Costliest in Asia-Pacific: Report
Real Estate Mumbai

Delhi-NCR Office Rent Soars to Rs 340/Sq Ft, Making It 6th Costliest in Asia-Pacific: Report

Delhi-NCR has emerged as the 6th costliest office market in the Asia-Pacific region, with office rent hitting Rs 340 per square foot, according to a recent report by Knight Frank India. The real estate consultant's latest edition of the Asia-Pacific Offic

November 16, 2024
Read Article