Ghost Pathologists in Maharashtra: MLA Manisha Kayande Exposes Bogus Practitioners

The issue of ‘ghost pathologists’ was brought to light in the state assembly on Wednesday by Shiv Sena MLA Manisha Kayande. She highlighted the alarming practice of unqualified laboratory technicians signing pathology reports, despite not being authorized to do so.

Kayande stated that only an MD (Pathology) is authorized to sign a pathology report. However, technicians are reportedly signing these reports, which she said amounts to malpractice. She urged the government to take action against such individuals under the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961.

In its February 25 issue, The Free Press Journal reported concerns raised by the Maharashtra Association of Practising Pathologists and Microbiologists (MAPPM). The association alleged that some laboratories in the state are operating in the names of deceased pathologists. In certain cases, pathologists’ names were reportedly used without mentioning their registration numbers.

According to MAPPM, nearly 8,000 pathology laboratories across Maharashtra are functioning without qualified pathologists. The association has accused the state government of failing to act against ‘bogus doctors,’ thereby putting public health at significant risk.

Kayande emphasized the rapid increase in pathology laboratories, including in urban areas, which has brought the issue to light. ‘Some laboratories are allegedly issuing test reports without the supervision of trained pathologists or recognized medical practitioners. In certain instances, lab technicians or other staff members are digitally signing reports on behalf of pathologists. This has severely eroded public trust in diagnostic testing, with serious concerns emerging over the credibility of reports issued by several laboratories,’ she said.

She sought clarification from the government on whether action would be taken against such pathologists under the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961, in the same manner as action taken against bogus doctors.

Responding to the issue, Health Minister Prakash Abitkar acknowledged the lack of clarity but assured that the government will soon convene a meeting with all stakeholders to discuss the matter and consider enacting appropriate legislation.

Dr. Sandip Yadav, president of MAPPM, stated that the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961, has adequate provisions to take action against bogus pathologists. ‘FIRs have been registered and action has been taken under the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961. There is no ambiguity. It appears that the government has been delaying the issue for the past two decades, possibly to protect these technicians for minor benefits,’ said Dr. Yadav.

The concerns raised by Kayande and MAPPM highlight the urgent need for stringent regulations and oversight to ensure the integrity and reliability of diagnostic testing in Maharashtra, ultimately safeguarding public health.