High Court Rules: Larger Apartments Pay Higher Maintenance Fees
The Bombay High Court has ruled that owners of larger apartments must pay higher maintenance charges in housing complexes, aligning with the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970. This decision came after a dispute involving a residential complex in Pune.
Bombay High CourtTreasure ParkMaintenance FeesMaharashtra Apartment Ownership ActResidential ComplexReal Estate MaharashtraAug 05, 2025
The condominium’s managing body had initially passed a resolution to collect equal maintenance charges from all flat owners, regardless of the flat size. However, this decision was challenged by owners of smaller flats in 2022. They argued that it violated the law, which clearly states that maintenance costs must be shared based on each owner’s undivided share of the common areas—something that depends on the size of the apartment.
The deputy registrar of co-operative societies agreed with the smaller flat owners and ordered the condominium to charge maintenance fees proportionally. Dissatisfied with this order, the owners of the larger flats first approached the Co-operative Court in Pune, but their case was dismissed in May 2022. They then moved the Bombay High Court, where their lawyer argued that maintenance is used for common areas and amenities used equally by all residents, and that assuming bigger flats have more residents—and therefore must pay more—is unfair.
However, the high court disagreed. Justice Milind Jadhav stated that both the law and the condominium’s own declaration documents support proportionate maintenance based on apartment size. Dismissing the petition, the court ruled that flat owners with larger homes must pay a larger share of the maintenance costs, as they hold a greater undivided interest in the common areas.
While under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971, flat owners are entitled only to their individual units and access to common amenities, the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 gives apartment owners legal ownership of an undivided share in the land and common areas of the property—essentially making them co-owners of the entire premises. This distinction affects how maintenance is calculated. In most co-operative housing societies governed by the 1971 Act, maintenance is typically charged equally per flat. However, in apartment-condominiums governed by the 1970 Act, maintenance must be charged in proportion to the carpet area of each unit.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main reason for the court's decision?
The court's decision was based on the provisions of the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, which mandates that maintenance costs be shared proportionally based on the size of the apartment.
How does the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, differ from the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971?
The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, gives apartment owners legal ownership of an undivided share in the land and common areas, making them co-owners of the entire premises. In contrast, the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971, entitles flat owners only to their individual units and access to common amenities.
What was the initial resolution passed by Treasure Park's managing body?
Treasure Park's managing body initially passed a resolution to collect equal maintenance charges from all flat owners, regardless of the flat size.
Why did the smaller flat owners challenge the resolution?
The smaller flat owners challenged the resolution because they believed it violated the law, which states that maintenance costs must be shared based on each owner’s undivided share of the common areas, which depends on the size of the apartment.
What was the court's final ruling?
The Bombay High Court ruled that flat owners with larger homes must pay a larger share of the maintenance costs, as they hold a greater undivided interest in the common areas.
Tags:
Related News Articles
Godrej Family's Anamudi Real Estate LLP to Offload 5% Stake in Sobha Ltd via $100 Million Block Deal
Anamudi Real Estate LLP, owned by the Godrej family, is set to divest 5% of its stake in Sobha Ltd through a block deal worth $100 million.
India's Luxury Housing Market Sees Unprecedented Growth: What's Driving the Demand?
Millennials and high-net-worth individuals are driving the demand for luxury housing in India, with Delhi-NCR, Mumbai, Hyderabad, and Pune reporting significant sales.
Jewar Airport Set to Transform Faridabad's Real Estate Market
The arrival of Jewar Airport is expected to provide a significant boost to Faridabad's real estate market, with the region set to attract 30,000 professionals over the next five years.
Kalyani Developers Expands into Residential Real Estate in Bengaluru and Hyderabad
Kalyani Developers, a well-known name in commercial real estate, is making a significant move into the residential market with new projects in Bengaluru and Hyderabad.
Karnataka RERA Orders Ozone Realtors to Address Delayed Possession and Pre-EMI Issues
The Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (KARNATAKA RERA) has issued a directive to Ozone Realtors Private Limited to resolve issues related to delayed possession and the failure to pay pre-EMI charges for a housing project in the state.
Twinkle Arora: Guiding NRIs to Unlock Naugaon's Real Estate Potential
The Indian real estate market is buzzing with opportunities, and NRIs are increasingly looking to invest in their homeland. Twinkle Arora, a seasoned real estate consultant, is helping NRIs navigate the complexities of investing in Naugaon, a promising ar