High Court Rules: Larger Apartments Pay Higher Maintenance Fees
The Bombay High Court has ruled that owners of larger apartments must pay higher maintenance charges in housing complexes, aligning with the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970. This decision came after a dispute involving a residential complex in Pune.
Bombay High CourtTreasure ParkMaintenance FeesMaharashtra Apartment Ownership ActResidential ComplexReal Estate MaharashtraAug 05, 2025
The condominium’s managing body had initially passed a resolution to collect equal maintenance charges from all flat owners, regardless of the flat size. However, this decision was challenged by owners of smaller flats in 2022. They argued that it violated the law, which clearly states that maintenance costs must be shared based on each owner’s undivided share of the common areas—something that depends on the size of the apartment.
The deputy registrar of co-operative societies agreed with the smaller flat owners and ordered the condominium to charge maintenance fees proportionally. Dissatisfied with this order, the owners of the larger flats first approached the Co-operative Court in Pune, but their case was dismissed in May 2022. They then moved the Bombay High Court, where their lawyer argued that maintenance is used for common areas and amenities used equally by all residents, and that assuming bigger flats have more residents—and therefore must pay more—is unfair.
However, the high court disagreed. Justice Milind Jadhav stated that both the law and the condominium’s own declaration documents support proportionate maintenance based on apartment size. Dismissing the petition, the court ruled that flat owners with larger homes must pay a larger share of the maintenance costs, as they hold a greater undivided interest in the common areas.
While under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971, flat owners are entitled only to their individual units and access to common amenities, the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 gives apartment owners legal ownership of an undivided share in the land and common areas of the property—essentially making them co-owners of the entire premises. This distinction affects how maintenance is calculated. In most co-operative housing societies governed by the 1971 Act, maintenance is typically charged equally per flat. However, in apartment-condominiums governed by the 1970 Act, maintenance must be charged in proportion to the carpet area of each unit.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main reason for the court's decision?
The court's decision was based on the provisions of the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, which mandates that maintenance costs be shared proportionally based on the size of the apartment.
How does the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, differ from the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971?
The Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970, gives apartment owners legal ownership of an undivided share in the land and common areas, making them co-owners of the entire premises. In contrast, the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1971, entitles flat owners only to their individual units and access to common amenities.
What was the initial resolution passed by Treasure Park's managing body?
Treasure Park's managing body initially passed a resolution to collect equal maintenance charges from all flat owners, regardless of the flat size.
Why did the smaller flat owners challenge the resolution?
The smaller flat owners challenged the resolution because they believed it violated the law, which states that maintenance costs must be shared based on each owner’s undivided share of the common areas, which depends on the size of the apartment.
What was the court's final ruling?
The Bombay High Court ruled that flat owners with larger homes must pay a larger share of the maintenance costs, as they hold a greater undivided interest in the common areas.
Tags:
Related News Articles
Mumbai's Sky-High Ambitions: Exploring the City's Love for Skyscrapers
As Mumbai continues to grow
Mumbai Records Third-Highest Surge in Luxury Housing Prices Globally
Mumbai's prime residential prices surge 11.5% year-on-year, ranking third globally, as India's economic growth drives demand in luxury housing market.
Affordable Housing Supply Dries Up as Builders Focus on Premium Projects
The latest data from JLL India reveals a 21% decline in affordable housing supply below Rs 50 lakh, while premium projects saw a significant surge in demand.
Priyanka Chopra's Real Estate Empire: A Peek into Her Investments
Priyanka Chopra Jonas is a keen investor in the real estate space, owning multiple properties in India and the US. Here's a look at her recent transactions.
Uber and Heads Up for Tails Expand Pet-Friendly Rides in Delhi and Mumbai
Uber has partnered with Heads Up for Tails to offer pet-friendly rides in Delhi and Mumbai, making travel more convenient and comfortable for pet owners.
Blackstone and Sattva-backed REIT Files Draft Papers for ₹7000 Cr IPO
A real estate investment trust (REIT) backed by asset manager Blackstone Group and Bengaluru developer Sattva Group has filed its draft papers with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for a ₹7000 crore initial public offering (IPO).