Karnataka CM Claims PM Modi Backs Controversial Bidadi Township Project

BENGALURU: Over the farmers' opposition to the Bidadi Township Project, which aims to acquire 7,481 acres of fertile lands in Bidadi of Bengaluru South district, Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar has stated that the project has received backing from Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The project is designed to alleviate the growing burden on Bengaluru city.

Shivakumar said he met Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi a few days ago, and the proposed Bidadi Township Project came up for discussion. During the meeting, Shivakumar mentioned that the Prime Minister told him he had built about 8 townships. Modi reportedly lauded Shivakumar for the Bidadi project, stating, “You are doing a good job.”

However, Union Minister of Large-Scale Industries and State Janata Dal Secular president H.D. Kumaraswamy has strongly criticized Shivakumar's statement. Kumaraswamy urged Shivakumar not to drag Prime Minister Narendra Modi's name into the Bidadi project, terming it the “biggest land scam.” He cautioned Shivakumar, “Don’t take the name of the Prime Minister’s Office to shield your real estate scam.”

Kumaraswamy emphasized his commitment to safeguarding “green over greed” and highlighted the significant environmental impact of the project. He pointed out that as many as 10 lakh trees would be felled to make way for the Bidadi Township Project. Additionally, the region is known for its dairy activities, producing 6 lakh liters of milk daily, and these activities would be severely affected by the project.

The controversy surrounding the Bidadi Township Project highlights the ongoing tension between development and environmental conservation. Critics argue that the project will displace farmers and destroy valuable agricultural land, while supporters believe it is necessary to support the growing urban population of Bengaluru.

Despite the opposition, Chief Minister Shivakumar remains committed to the project, citing the Prime Minister's support and the potential benefits for the region. The project's future remains uncertain as stakeholders continue to debate its merits and drawbacks.

In the meantime, environmentalists and farmers are urging the government to reconsider the project and explore alternative solutions that balance development with sustainability. The outcome of this debate will likely have far-reaching implications for both the region and the broader issue of urban expansion in India.