Madras High Court Rules: RERA Act Does Not Empower Granting of Permanent Injunction
The Madras High Court has ruled that a suit for common law remedy, such as a permanent injunction, cannot be sought before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). The decision clarifies the jurisdictional boundaries and the scope of the RERA Act.
Rera ActMadras High CourtPermanent InjunctionReal EstateCivil SuitReal EstateSep 28, 2025
The High Court considered the question of whether a suit for a common law remedy, namely a relief of permanent injunction, can be sought before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The Bench, presided over by Justice P.B. Balaji, observed that the common law equitable remedy of permanent injunction is not available under the provisions of the RERA Act.
Justice Balaji stated, “On a careful appreciation of the ratio laid down in all the above cases and applying the same to the facts of the present case, I do not see that the suit filed by the plaintiff claiming the relief of permanent injunction can be said to be barred under Sections 36 or 37, which clearly operate in different fields altogether. The common law equitable remedy of permanent injunction not being available to the plaintiff under any of the provisions of the RERA Act, the civil suit instituted by the respondent is certainly maintainable and cannot be rejected as being barred under law invoking Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC.”
Advocate N.Nandhakumar represented the Petitioner, while Advocate R.Venkatraman represented the Respondents. The Petitioner contended that the suit instituted by the Respondent-developer was not maintainable, in view of the bar under Section 79 of the RERA Act, 2016. It was also argued that under Sections 37 and 38 of the RERA Act, the authority is empowered to grant the relief of injunction, and therefore, the suit should be struck down as it is barred under law, invoking Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC).
On the other hand, the Respondent-Developer argued that being only for a bare permanent injunction, it was an equitable remedy for which the Petitioner was entitled to approach the Civil Court. They referred to Sections 36 and 37 of the RERA Act, contending that these sections operate in different spheres and platforms altogether, and the authority under the Act was not empowered to grant the relief of permanent injunction.
The question before the High Court was whether a suit for a common law remedy, such as a relief of permanent injunction, can be sought before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The Court referred to Sections 36, 37, 40, and 79 of the RERA Act. The Court emphasized that the object of Section 36 is to protect the interest of parties who are before the authority in a pending inquiry, and one of them complains about the contravention of the provisions of the Act.
The Court observed that since the Petitioner was in peaceful enjoyment of the disputed suit property and the Respondent-Developer was attempting to interfere with the possession of the Petitioner, the said reliefs could not be sought by the promoter under Sections 36 and 37 of the Act or Section 40(2) of the Act. After referring to various judgments, the Court concluded that the suit filed by the plaintiff claiming the relief of permanent injunction is not barred under Sections 36 or 37, which operate in different fields altogether.
The Court stated, “The Trial Court has rightly, in my considered opinion, found that the power to grant injunction is not available under the provisions of the RERA Act and the cause of action as set out in the plaint clearly entitles the plaintiff to maintain the civil suit. The Trial Court has also rightly refused to look into the application filed by the revision petitioner before RERA, as it is alien for consideration in an application for rejection of the plaint.”
Accordingly, the Petition was dismissed.
The case title is Metrozone Apartment Owners Association v. M/s. Ozone Projects Private Limited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the RERA Act?
The RERA Act, or Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, is a law in India that aims to protect the interests of homebuyers and promote transparency and accountability in the real estate sector.
Can a suit for permanent injunction be filed before RERA?
No, according to the Madras High Court, a suit for a common law remedy, such as a permanent injunction, cannot be sought before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).
What did the Madras High Court rule regarding the RERA Act and permanent injunction?
The Madras High Court ruled that the common law equitable remedy of permanent injunction is not available under the provisions of the RERA Act, and thus, a civil suit for such relief is maintainable and cannot be rejected as being barred under law.
What is the significance of this ruling?
This ruling clarifies the jurisdictional boundaries between civil courts and the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, ensuring that common law remedies are sought through the appropriate legal channels.
Who represented the parties in this case?
Advocate N.Nandhakumar represented the Petitioner, while Advocate R.Venkatraman represented the Respondents in the case Metrozone Apartment Owners Association v. M/s. Ozone Projects Private Limited.
Related News Articles
Indian Stock Market Ends on a Positive Note, Real Estate Stocks in Focus
Benchmark equity indices, S&P BSE Sensex and NSE Nifty50, ended Wednesday's choppy session on a flat note. Real estate stocks, including NBCC, were in focus after the company announced a proposal for issuing bonus shares.
NBCC Proposes to Complete 17 Stalled Supertech Projects, Aiding 27,000 Home Buyers
NBCC moves to develop and complete 17 stalled Supertech projects, benefiting 27,000 home buyers. The state-owned company has filed an intervention application in the Supreme Court, proposing to take over the projects.
Maharashtra: Real Estate Developers Face Penalties for Misleading Ads
According to ASCI, the real estate sector emerged as the most violative, accounting for 34% of cases investigated.
Suraj Estate Developers Secures 'Hold' Rating Amid Robust Financial Health
Suraj Estate Developers, a notable player in the construction and real estate sector, has been given a 'Hold' rating by MarketsMojo. The company’s strong financial performance, including a 20.50% ROCE and significant profit margins, underscores its manage
Experts Applaud IBC's Success in Resolving Real Estate Distress
Industry experts have lauded the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for its effectiveness in resolving distressed real estate projects, bringing much-needed relief to both developers and homebuyers.
Vadodara Property Scam: Mumbai Developers Held on Land-Grabbing Charges
Two individuals from Mumbai have been arrested in connection with a land-grabbing scam in Vadodara, Gujarat. The accused are alleged to have promised a property to a buyer but failed to hand it over despite receiving Rs 18 crore as payment.