Maharashtra Court Rejects Bail for Property Dealer in Land-Grab Case

Published: January 18, 2026 | Category: Real Estate Maharashtra
Maharashtra Court Rejects Bail for Property Dealer in Land-Grab Case

MUMBAI: A Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) Court has rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Sainath Kamlakar Mhatre, a property dealer from Borivali, in a land-grab and forgery case. The case involves the alleged illegal sale of a Borivali property using fake documents while the original owners were abroad.

During the hearing on Wednesday, Special Judge Vikram R. Jagdale rejected the bail, stating that the material on record indicated a deep-rooted conspiracy involving a substantial amount of money. The court emphasized that custodial questioning was essential to trace the forged records and the money trail.

The case was registered by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), which alleges that an ancestral land parcel at Valnai village in Borivali was illegally usurped by someone using fabricated deeds, forged government seals and stamps, and manipulated city survey entries. Subsequent investigations revealed that the accused forged documents to sell the property to private developers after the original owners died, with their legal heirs residing abroad.

Although Mhatre was not initially named in the First Information Report (FIR), his role emerged during the investigation. The court noted that his bank account reflected multiple suspicious transactions related to the property deal. It was crucial to probe the money trail of nearly ₹15 crore that was deposited in his account and how the amount was subsequently diverted.

The rejection of bail underscores the seriousness of the charges and the need for a thorough investigation to uncover the extent of the conspiracy and the involvement of all parties. The court's decision is a significant step in ensuring justice for the original owners and their legal heirs, who were victimized by this fraudulent activity.

The case highlights the importance of due diligence and the need for stringent measures to prevent such land-grab and forgery cases, which can have severe financial and emotional consequences for the victims. Authorities are continuing their investigation to bring all those involved to justice and to recover the misappropriated funds.

Stay Updated with GeoSquare WhatsApp Channels

Get the latest real estate news, market insights, auctions, and project updates delivered directly to your WhatsApp. No spam, only high-value alerts.

GeoSquare Real Estate News WhatsApp Channel Preview

Never Miss a Real Estate News Update — Get Daily, High-Value Alerts on WhatsApp!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the nature of the case against Sainath Mhatre?
Sainath Mhatre is accused of selling a Borivali property using forged documents while the original owners were abroad. The case involves a significant money trail and is being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW).
2. Why did the court reject Mhatre's anticipatory bail plea?
The court rejected the bail plea because the material on record indicated a deep-rooted conspiracy involving a substantial amount of money. Custodial questioning was deemed essential to trace forged records and the money trail.
3. What evidence led to Mhatre's involvement in the case?
Mhatre's bank account reflected multiple suspicious transactions related to the property deal, including the deposit of nearly ₹15 crore. This led to the court's conclusion that his role needed further investigation.
4. How did the original owners of the property become victims?
The original owners died, and their legal heirs were residing abroad. The accused forged documents to sell the property to private developers, usurping the land and diverting the funds.
5. What is the role of the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) in this case?
The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) registered the case and is conducting the investigation. They are responsible for tracing the forged records and the money trail to bring all those involved to justice.