Maharashtra Tribunal Orders Developer to Refund ₹13.5L Booking Fee with Interest
Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal orders developer to refund ₹13.5L booking fee with interest
Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate TribunalMreatRera Act 2016HomebuyersDevelopersBooking FeeRefundReal Estate NewsOct 02, 2024
The allottees had paid ₹13.5 lakh as a booking fee, but were unable to secure a loan and requested cancellation of the allotment. The developer had forfeited the booking amount, but MREAT has now set aside a MahaRERA order and directed the promoter to refund the amount with interest.
MREAT held that the promoter had violated Section 13 of the RERA Act 2016, which casts an obligation on the promoter to not accept from the allottee a sum over 10% of the cost of the flat without first entering into a written agreement for sale. The promoter had received more than 10% of the total consideration and did not execute the registered agreement for sale.
The allottees, who were represented by advocate Anil D'Souza, had jointly booked a flat in the project for a total consideration of ₹1.15 crore and paid ₹13.5 lakh to the promoter. However, the promoter issued an allotment letter only in the name of one of the allottees, which led to the bank turning down their request for a home loan.
The tribunal observed that the Act is silent on the point of permissible deduction if the allottee or promoter cancels the booking. However, MREAT stated that it is of the view that there should be reasonable logic while forfeiting the amount deposited by the allottees. There is nothing on record to show that because of the cancellation of booking by the allottees, the promoter has suffered damages or loss.
If the promoter is allowed to forfeit earnest money without any justifiable reason, it will defeat the very object of the statute, MREAT stated. Sub-section 3 of Section 18 of the RERA Act 2016 entitles allottees to seek compensation from the promoter on account of failure to discharge any other obligation imposed on him under the Act or rules or regulations under it.
The ruling is a significant victory for homebuyers in Maharashtra, who have been struggling to get their dues from developers. The MREAT order is expected to set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
The promoter, Avant Heritage, had argued that the allottees had cancelled the booking and therefore, the booking amount was forfeited. However, MREAT rejected this argument and directed the promoter to refund the amount with interest.
The MahaRERA order had earlier directed the developer to cancel the booking and refund the amount, but without interest. However, MREAT has now modified this order and directed the promoter to refund the amount with interest.
The ruling is a significant blow to developers who have been forfeiting booking amounts without any justifiable reason. The MREAT order is expected to bring relief to homebuyers who have been struggling to get their dues from developers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT)?
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT) is a tribunal that hears appeals against orders passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA).
What is the RERA Act 2016?
The RERA Act 2016 is a law that regulates the real estate sector in India. It aims to protect the interests of homebuyers and promote transparency and accountability in the sector.
Can a developer forfeit a booking amount without any justifiable reason?
No, according to the MREAT order, a developer cannot forfeit a booking amount without any justifiable reason. The developer must refund the amount with interest if the allottee cancels the booking due to no fault of their own.
What is the significance of the MREAT order?
The MREAT order is significant because it sets a precedent for similar cases in the future. It also brings relief to homebuyers who have been struggling to get their dues from developers.
Can a homebuyer seek compensation from a developer under the RERA Act 2016?
Yes, according to the RERA Act 2016, a homebuyer can seek compensation from a developer if the developer fails to discharge any obligation imposed on him under the Act or rules or regulations under it.
Tags:
Related News Articles
Revitalizing Affordable Housing in India: What to Expect from the Modi Government
The Indian real estate sector is eagerly waiting for the Modi government's response to its needs. Will the government grant industry status to the entire housing sector and take effective steps to rejuvenate the affordable housing segment?
NAREDCO Maharashtra NextGen Launches Excelerate 3.0: Innovation in Construction
The National Real Estate Development Council (NAREDCO) Maharashtra NextGen is thrilled to announce the third edition of its flagship annual event, Excelerate 3.0, set to take place on November 14, 2024. This year’s theme, ‘Innovation in Construction,’ foc
Lodha Brothers Urged to Settle Real Estate Dispute Amicably
A leading figure in the Mumbai real estate industry has urged the Lodha brothers to resolve their ongoing dispute amicably, drawing a parallel to the Raheja family's successful resolution of a similar conflict.
How Much Luxury Real Estate Can You Buy for 10 Lakhs in Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Delhi?
Explore how much luxury real estate you can purchase for 10 lakhs in major cities like Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Delhi, as per the latest report from Knight Frank.
Maharashtra Budget 2025: Infrastructure Boost, Job Creation, and Road Development
Maharashtra Budget 2025, presented by Finance Minister Ajit Pawar, focuses on significant infrastructure projects, including the development of a new airport, job generation, and road improvement. The budget also secures substantial funding for the Mahara
Dubai Real Estate Sees 4.76% Increase in Mortgage Transactions as Fed Rates Hold Steady
Steady interest rates have bolstered buyer confidence, leading to a significant rise in real estate transactions in Dubai. The Federal Reserve's decision to maintain rate levels has further encouraged investors to enter the market.