MahaREAT Finds MahaRERA's Dismissal of Homebuyer's Complaint Incorrect, Orders Refund of ₹4.5 Lakh

Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) has set aside the order of Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) and directed the builder to refund ₹4.5 lakh to the homebuyer.

Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate TribunalMahareraHomebuyerComplaintRefundCompensationReal EstateSep 09, 2024

MahaREAT Finds MahaRERA's Dismissal of Homebuyer's Complaint Incorrect, Orders Refund of ₹4.5 Lakh
Real Estate:Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) bench, comprising Shriram R. Jagtap (Judicial Member) and Dr. K Shivaji (Technical Member), has held that the dismissal of the homebuyer's complaint by Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) was incorrect.

The homebuyer had booked a flat in the builder's project named Kanakia Miami situated at Mahim, on 28th March 2017, and executed and registered the agreement for sale on 28th June 2017 for a total consideration of ₹5,38,78,880/-. However, even after paying the full consideration to the builder, the complainant did not receive possession of the flat on time.

According to Clause 9(i) of the agreement for sale, the delivery of possession of the flat by the builder was supposed to be completed on or before 30th September 2018. The homebuyer filed a complaint before MahaRERA seeking a refund, compensation for the delay in delivery, and compensation for the deficit in carpet area.

MahaRERA, in its order dated 24th May 2021, held that the homebuyer cannot be permitted to agitate his claims as allottees at this belated stage and dismissed the complaint by holding it non-maintainable.

Aggrieved by the MahaRERA order, the homebuyer filed an appeal before the Tribunal seeking to set aside the order, a refund for the excess money taken by the builder, and interest for the delay in handing over the possession.

On the issue of maintainability, the Tribunal referred to Section 31 of the RERA, 2016, which stipulates that for a complaint to be valid, the Homebuyer must be aggrieved by violations of the Act, and the complaint must be against a builder, homebuyer, or real estate agent. Since both conditions were met in this case, the Tribunal held that MahaRERA had incorrectly dismissed the homebuyer's complaint as not maintainable.

The Tribunal also referred to clause 5(xvi) of the agreement for sale, which stipulated that – “A fee of ₹9,00,000 is payable to Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited by the sellers and purchasers in equal proportions for issuing the NOC and noting the lien in favor of the purchasers. Since no society has been formed yet, no transfer fees are payable to the society”.

The Tribunal determined that the builder cannot claim transfer fees for issuing the NOC as per the agreement. The homebuyer, along with other purchasers, were required to pay ₹9,00,000, as specified in the agreement. However, the Tribunal directed that only half of this amount, which is ₹4,50,000, should be refunded.

On the issue of the deficit in the carpet area, the Tribunal held that the homebuyer failed to provide convincing evidence regarding the alleged deficit. Therefore, the homebuyer is not entitled to a refund for the claimed shortfall in the carpet area.

On the issue of compensation, the Tribunal held that homebuyer is entitled to homebuyer interest at the prescribed rate for each month of delay until the possession of the flat is handed over. However, since the homebuyer have already settled for a rebate of ₹7,50,000, they are not entitled to additional interest for the delay in possession or to any further compensation.

Case – Mr. Jaikishan Udhav Lakhwani & anr Versus M/s. Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited

Citation - APPEAL NO. AT006000000053230

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the issue in the case?

The homebuyer had not received possession of the flat on time and had filed a complaint before MahaRERA seeking a refund, compensation for the delay in delivery, and compensation for the deficit in carpet area.

What was the order of MahaRERA?

MahaRERA held that the homebuyer cannot be permitted to agitate his claims as allottees at this belated stage and dismissed the complaint by holding it non-maintainable.

What was the decision of the Tribunal?

The Tribunal set aside the order of MahaRERA and directed the builder to refund ₹4.5 lakh to the homebuyer.

What was the reason for the refund?

The Tribunal determined that the builder cannot claim transfer fees for issuing the NOC as per the agreement and directed that only half of the amount, which is ₹4,50,000, should be refunded.

Was the homebuyer entitled to compensation?

The Tribunal held that homebuyer is entitled to homebuyer interest at the prescribed rate for each month of delay until the possession of the flat is handed over, but since the homebuyer have already settled for a rebate of ₹7,50,000, they are not entitled to additional interest for the delay in possession or to any further compensation.

Related News Articles

Arvind SmartSpaces Ltd Sees Impressive Growth with 49% YoY Increase in Bookings
Real Estate Maharashtra

Arvind SmartSpaces Ltd Sees Impressive Growth with 49% YoY Increase in Bookings

Arvind SmartSpaces Limited announces its Q1 FY25 financial results, boasting a 49% YoY growth in bookings and a 21% increase in collections.

July 30, 2024
Read Article
Former IPS Officer Challenges Environmental Risks in Deep-Sea Sand Mining Project
Real Estate Mumbai

Former IPS Officer Challenges Environmental Risks in Deep-Sea Sand Mining Project

A former IPS officer has filed a petition with the National Green Tribunal (NGT) against the environmental risks associated with a deep-sea sand mining project. The National Real Estate Development Council (NAREDCO) has opposed the petition, contending th

October 15, 2024
Read Article
Mumbai Police Seizes Rs 388 Crore in Mahadev Online Betting Scandal
Real Estate Mumbai

Mumbai Police Seizes Rs 388 Crore in Mahadev Online Betting Scandal

The properties seized include investments made by a Mauritius-based firm, Tano Investment Opportunities Fund, which is linked to Hari Shankar Tibrewal, and significant real estate assets...

December 7, 2024
Read Article
Orchid Island Capital Expands with Increased Authorized Shares
real estate news

Orchid Island Capital Expands with Increased Authorized Shares

Orchid Island Capital, Inc., a prominent real estate investment trust with a market capitalization of $742 million, has recently amended its charter to increase its authorized shares. This strategic move aims to enhance the company's financial flexibility

February 15, 2025
Read Article
Godrej Properties Expands with Rs 9,650 Crore Projects in Key Urban Areas
Real Estate Mumbai

Godrej Properties Expands with Rs 9,650 Crore Projects in Key Urban Areas

Godrej Properties, a leading real estate developer in India, is set to expand its footprint with a series of new projects worth Rs 9,650 crore. These projects will be strategically located in key urban areas such as Delhi-NCR and Mumbai, further solidifyi

October 12, 2024
Read Article
Taiwan's Real Estate Industry Shines with ESG Focus at 2024 FIABCI-Taiwan Excellence Awards
Real Estate

Taiwan's Real Estate Industry Shines with ESG Focus at 2024 FIABCI-Taiwan Excellence Awards

The 2024 FIABCI-Taiwan Real Estate Excellence Awards celebrate ESG initiatives, architectural aesthetics, and sustainable development in Taiwan's real estate industry.

July 26, 2024
Read Article