MahaREAT Orders Builder to Refund ₹4.5 Lakh to Homebuyer, Sets Aside MahaRERA's Dismissal of Complaint
Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) has set aside the dismissal of a homebuyer's complaint by MahaRERA and directed the builder to refund ₹4.5 lakh received for the issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) for transfer of the flat to a
MahareatMahareraHomebuyerBuilderReal EstateRera2016Real Estate NewsSep 09, 2024
The homebuyer had booked a flat in the builder's project named Kanakia Miami situated at Mahim, on 28th March 2017, and executed and registered the agreement for sale on 28th June 2017 for a total consideration of ₹5,38,78,880/-. According to Clause 9(i) of the agreement for sale, the delivery of possession of the flat by the builder was supposed to be completed on or before 30th September 2018.
However, even after paying the full consideration to the builder, the complainant did not receive possession of the flat on time. Therefore, being aggrieved, the homebuyer filed a complaint before MahaRERA seeking a refund, compensation for the delay in delivery, and compensation for the deficit in carpet area.
MahaRERA, in its order dated 24th May 2021, held that the homebuyer cannot be permitted to agitate his claims as allottees at this belated stage and dismissed the complaint by holding it non maintainable.
Aggrieved by the MahaRERA order, the homebuyer filed an appeal before the Tribunal seeking to set aside the order, a refund for the excess money taken by the builder, and interest for the delay in handing over the possession.
On the issue of maintainability, the Tribunal referred to Section 31 of the RERA, 2016, which stipulates that for a complaint to be valid, the Homebuyer must be aggrieved by violations of the Act, and the complaint must be against a builder, homebuyer, or real estate agent. Since both conditions were met in this case, the Tribunal held that MahaRERA had incorrectly dismissed the homebuyer's complaint as not maintainable.
The Tribunal also referred to clause 5(xvi) of the agreement for sale, which stipulated that – “A fee of ₹9,00,000 is payable to Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited by the sellers and purchasers in equal proportions for issuing the NOC and noting the lien in favor of the purchasers. Since no society has been formed yet, no transfer fees are payable to the society”. The Tribunal determined that the builder cannot claim transfer fees for issuing the NOC as per the agreement.
The homebuyer, along with other purchasers, were required to pay ₹9,00,000, as specified in the agreement. However, the Tribunal directed that only half of this amount, which is ₹4,50,000, should be refunded.
On the issue of the deficit in the carpet area, the Tribunal held that the homebuyer failed to provide convincing evidence regarding the alleged deficit. Therefore, the homebuyer is not entitled to a refund for the claimed shortfall in the carpet area.
On the issue of compensation, the Tribunal held that homebuyer is entitled to homebuyer interest at the prescribed rate for each month of delay until the possession of the flat is handed over. However, since the homebuyer have already settled for a rebate of ₹7,50,000, they are not entitled to additional interest for the delay in possession or to any further compensation.
Case – Mr. Jaikishan Udhav Lakhwani & anr Versus M/s. Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited
Citation - APPEAL NO. AT006000000053230
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the issue in the case?
The homebuyer had booked a flat in the builder's project named Kanakia Miami situated at Mahim, but did not receive possession of the flat on time despite paying the full consideration.
What was the order of MahaRERA?
MahaRERA held that the homebuyer cannot be permitted to agitate his claims as allottees at this belated stage and dismissed the complaint by holding it non maintainable.
What was the decision of the Tribunal?
The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the homebuyer's complaint by MahaRERA and directed the builder to refund ₹4.5 lakh received for the issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) for transfer of the flat to a third party purchaser.
What was the issue of maintainability in the case?
The Tribunal referred to Section 31 of the RERA, 2016, which stipulates that for a complaint to be valid, the Homebuyer must be aggrieved by violations of the Act, and the complaint must be against a builder, homebuyer, or real estate agent.
What was the outcome on the issue of compensation?
The Tribunal held that homebuyer is entitled to homebuyer interest at the prescribed rate for each month of delay until the possession of the flat is handed over, but since the homebuyer have already settled for a rebate of ₹7,50,000, they are not entitled to additional interest for the delay in possession or to any further compensation.
Related News Articles
Goldman Sachs Leases Massive Office Space in Mumbai's Worli for ₹2 Crore+ per Month
Goldman Sachs has leased over 73,000 sq ft of office space in K Raheja's Acentia project for ₹2 crore+ per month.
Real Estate Sector: A Journey of Horror Stories and Future Prospects
Former MahaRERA chief Ajoy Mehta highlights the numerous horror stories in the real estate sector and the shift towards rental housing in his book 'RERA - A Perspective'.
Pune Leads Q1 2025 Real Estate Growth with 20% Year-over-Year Surge
Pune, 3rd April 2025: Knight Frank India's latest report, 'India Real Estate: Office and Residential Market (January – March 2025) Q1 2025', highlights Pune's impressive real estate performance, with a significant 20% year-over-year surge in residential transactions.
Nomura Predicts Nifty to Reach 24,970 by March 2026: Top Picks for 2025
Nomura, a leading financial services firm, has forecasted that the Nifty 50 index will reach 24,970 by March 2026. This positive outlook is driven by several factors, including the recovery in the real estate sector and strong corporate earnings. Here are the top picks for 2025.
ABREL Sells Century Pulp and Paper for Rs 3498 Crore in Strategic Move
Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited (ABREL), the real estate division of the Aditya Birla Group, has divested its stake in Century Pulp and Paper for Rs 3498 crore. This strategic move aims to streamline operations and focus on core real estate projects.
Mumbai-Based Pranav Constructions Files DRHP for Rs 392 Crore IPO
Mumbai-based real estate company Pranav Constructions has taken a significant step towards its public listing by filing its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The company plans to raise Rs 392 crore