MahaRERA Grants Relief to Homebuyers in Ghatkopar Real Estate Dispute

Published: February 27, 2026 | Category: real estate news
MahaRERA Grants Relief to Homebuyers in Ghatkopar Real Estate Dispute

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has provided partial relief to homebuyers in a dispute against developer Rare Townships Private Limited, concerning a housing project in Ghatkopar, Mumbai. In a recent order, MahaRERA Member Mahesh Pathak set aside the developer’s termination of agreements for two flats in the “North Sea Heights (A1)” project at Ghatkopar East. The authority directed the developer to give the allottees a final opportunity to clear outstanding dues with applicable interest. Additionally, the promoter was ordered to pay interest for the delay in handing over possession.

The dispute involves two flats booked by Venkatesh Ramaswamy and Gayatri Sundararajan under agreements for sale executed on August 28, 2019. The total consideration for the flats was over Rs 2.88 crore, with more than 50% of the amount already paid. The promoter, however, alleged persistent defaults in instalment payments and issued termination notices in July 2024 and February 2025, seeking cancellation deeds.

Advocate Anil D’souza appeared for the complainants. The homebuyers approached MahaRERA in 2025, contending that they were ready and willing to pay but were issued incorrect and inconsistent demand letters. They also alleged confusion regarding escrow account details and argued that the project was delayed beyond the promised possession date of December 31, 2021.

After examining the submissions from both sides, MahaRERA noted that promoters and allottees have reciprocal obligations under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). The authority observed that the registered agreements for sale were binding on both parties, and the allottees were legally obliged to make timely payments. In case of delay, they would be liable to pay interest under Section 19(7) of the Act.

On the termination issue, the authority held that although the termination notices appeared to have been validly issued, the principles of natural justice warranted granting the allottees one fair and final opportunity to clear outstanding dues along with applicable interest. The termination notices were accordingly set aside.

Regarding project delay, MahaRERA noted that even after granting a one-year Covid-19 extension, which extended the possession deadline to December 31, 2022, the project remained incomplete and no Occupation Certificate (OC) had been obtained. The authority rejected the promoter’s force majeure arguments relating to environmental clearances, civil aviation height restrictions, and changes in Development Control Regulations.

MahaRERA held that the promoter had violated Section 18 of RERA and directed it to pay interest to the allottees from January 1, 2023, until the offer of possession with OC. The interest will be calculated at the State Bank of India’s Marginal Cost of Lending Rate (MCLR) plus 2%, on the actual amount paid, excluding stamp duty, registration charges, and taxes. The authority permitted a set-off mechanism, allowing adjustment of outstanding dues against the interest payable at the time of possession.

Despite the relief granted, MahaRERA rejected the allottees’ claim for compensation under Section 18 of RERA. The authority observed that since the buyers were willing to remain in the project and seek possession of the flats, they were entitled only to interest for the delay and not compensation, in view of Section 18(1) of RERA.

Stay Updated with GeoSquare WhatsApp Channels

Get the latest real estate news, market insights, auctions, and project updates delivered directly to your WhatsApp. No spam, only high-value alerts.

GeoSquare Real Estate News WhatsApp Channel Preview

Never Miss a Real Estate News Update — Get Daily, High-Value Alerts on WhatsApp!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What was the main issue in the Ghatkopar real estate dispute?
The main issue was the delayed possession and alleged payment defaults by homebuyers in the 'North Sea Heights (A1)' project, leading to the developer issuing termination notices.
2. What did MahaRER
decide regarding the termination notices? A: MahaRERA set aside the termination notices, giving the allottees a final opportunity to clear outstanding dues with applicable interest.
3. How did MahaRER
address the issue of project delays? A: MahaRERA noted that even after a one-year extension due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the project remained incomplete and no Occupation Certificate (OC) had been obtained, rejecting the promoter's force majeure arguments.
4. What compensation did the homebuyers receive?
The homebuyers were entitled to interest for the delay in possession, calculated at the State Bank of India’s Marginal Cost of Lending Rate (MCLR) plus 2%, but not compensation under Section 18 of RERA.
5. What were the homebuyers' arguments against the developer?
The homebuyers argued that they were ready and willing to pay but were issued incorrect and inconsistent demand letters, and there was confusion regarding escrow account details.