Mumbai Real Estate Tribunal Overturns MahaRERA Order on Flat Non-Delivery
The Mumbai Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT) has overturned a 2020 MahaRERA order, granting relief to a buyer who was denied a refund due to the absence of a registered flat sale agreement.
Mumbai Real EstateMahareraMreatReraFlat Sale AgreementReal Estate NewsMay 26, 2025
The MREAT directed the developer to refund the amount paid by the Andheri-based allottee, along with interest. The allottee, Stanley Saldanha, represented by advocate Anil D' Souza, had booked a flat in an IndiaBulls project at Panvel in August 2013 and had paid a sum of over Rs 26 lakh. Due to the slow pace of construction and delay in the handover of possession of the flat, Saldanha sought to withdraw from the project in 2019.
However, the developer sought to deduct cancellation charges and forfeit a part of the paid amount when Saldanha demanded an exit. The MREAT ruled that the MahaRERA order by chairman Gautam Chatterjee had erred in holding that the provisions of Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) would not apply in the absence of a registered agreement for sale. In this case, a detailed booking application form existed, running to about 26 pages, which reflected the agreed positions of the parties, akin to an agreement for sale.
The MREAT emphasized that the agreement need not be in writing and that any other document containing the requisite contents of the agreement would suffice. The tribunal also noted that the intentions of the parties matter more than the nomenclature of the transaction instruments. The MREAT had previously held that even a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) could be considered a valid instrument for the purposes of Section 18 of the Act.
The MREAT further stated that linking possession delivery dates with occupation dates in this case is legally unsustainable. The tribunal pointed out that the promoter had violated Section 11 (3) of the Act by failing to write and intimate a specific possession date and the stage-wise project construction status at the time of booking. The MREAT also highlighted that there is no express provision in the Act that allows a promoter to forfeit earnest amounts or any other amount in the event of booking cancellation by either party.
This ruling is significant as it clarifies the legal stance on the requirements for agreements and the rights of buyers in the real estate sector. It provides a clearer framework for both developers and buyers, ensuring that the interests of buyers are protected even in the absence of a formal, registered agreement.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the MahaRERA?
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) is a regulatory body established under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) to promote transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in the real estate sector in Maharashtra.
What is the MREAT?
The Mumbai Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT) is an appellate body that hears appeals against orders and decisions of MahaRERA. It provides a higher level of review and ensures that the decisions of MahaRERA are fair and in accordance with the law.
What did the MREAT rule in this case?
The MREAT ruled that the absence of a registered flat sale agreement is not a valid reason to deny relief to a buyer. The tribunal directed the developer to refund the amount paid by the buyer, along with interest, and emphasized that the intentions of the parties and the contents of other documents can suffice as an agreement.
What is Section 18 of the RERA Act?
Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) deals with the obligations of promoters and the rights of allottees. It includes provisions for timely delivery of possession, compensation for delays, and the right of buyers to seek refunds or compensation in case of non-delivery.
What are the implications of this ruling for the real estate sector?
This ruling clarifies the legal requirements for agreements between developers and buyers and emphasizes the protection of buyers' rights. It ensures that even in the absence of a formal, registered agreement, buyers can seek relief and refunds, promoting transparency and accountability in the real estate sector.
Related News Articles
Monsoon 2023: Maharashtra Welcomes the Rainy Season, Mumbai to Follow in 3-4 Days
The Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) has announced the arrival of monsoon in Maharashtra, with Mumbai expecting to receive rainfall in the next 3-4 days.
Raymond Unlocks Value with Demerger of Real Estate Business into Raymond Realty
Raymond announces demerger of its Real Estate Business into Raymond Realty, paving the way for separate listings on stock exchanges.
Anant Raj Cloud Joins Forces with Google to Power India's Digital Revolution
Real Estate News - Get the latest updates on India's data center market and its growth potential...
Brand Street Integrated Expands its Footprint in Pune with Krishna Mugatkar as Business Director
Brand Street Integrated strengthens its presence in Pune with the appointment of Krishna Mugatkar as Business Director, bringing his expertise in marketing and real estate to the table.
55th FIR Registered Against Mohali Real Estate Developer Bajwa
A fresh case of property fraud has been registered against Mohali-based realtor Jarnail Singh Bajwa, bringing the total number of FIRs against him to 55. Kharar resident Manjit Kaur accused Bajwa of cheating her of ₹15.75 lakh for the purchase of a shop-c
Macrotech Developers Acquires 7 Land Parcels to Develop Rs 16,600 Crore Housing Projects
Realty firm Macrotech Developers has acquired seven land parcels in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), Pune, and Bengaluru to develop housing projects worth Rs 16,600 crore.