NCLAT Upholds Eviction of Hotel Operator Following Resolution Plan Approval

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed an appeal filed by Nazru S. Basheer, the proprietor of Hotel MB International, upholding an NCLT order that directed him to vacate the hotel premises after the approval of a resolution plan for Pancard Clubs Ltd.

NclatNcltInsolvencyHotelReal EstateReal EstateJun 21, 2025

NCLAT Upholds Eviction of Hotel Operator Following Resolution Plan Approval
Real Estate:The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed an appeal filed by Nazru S. Basheer, proprietor of Hotel MB International, challenging an NCLT order that directed him to vacate the hotel premises following the approval of a resolution plan for Pancard Clubs Ltd. The dispute is centered around a Conducting Agreement executed in July 2017, under which the hotel building, owned by Pancard Clubs Ltd., a company that later underwent insolvency, was leased to Basheer for a period of six years. The appellant had been operating Hotel MB International under this agreement.

In May 2025, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, directed Basheer to hand over vacant possession of the property, noting that the term of the agreement had expired in August 2023 and no rights remained with the appellant to continue occupying the premises. The NCLT order was passed in I 2023 during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Pancard Clubs.

The case stems from a 2017 agreement between Pancard Clubs and the appellant, giving the latter operational control over the hotel, a restaurant, and a gift shop. The agreement included payment of royalty and offered the possibility of extension at the corporate debtor's discretion. In 2022, insolvency proceedings were initiated against Pancard Clubs Ltd. under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). A resolution professional (RP) was appointed, who, in the course of reviewing assets and agreements, identified the hotel premises as part of the corporate debtor’s estate. Notices were issued to Basheer in December 2022 and again in April and May 2023, demanding outstanding royalty and return of possession.

The RP then filed I.A. No. 3958 of 2023, seeking a direction from the NCLT to recover possession. A parallel application under Sections 45 and 48 of the IBC was also filed to challenge the original agreement as a preferential transaction. In April 2024, a resolution plan was approved, and the successful resolution applicant, Chemhub Tradelink Pvt. Ltd., took over and continued prosecuting the possession-related application.

Basheer argued that although the agreement was signed in 2017, he only took possession in 2021. Therefore, he claimed the six-year term should be counted from that date. He further contended that significant investments had been made in running the hotel, and Clause 28 of the agreement allowed for extension, which had not been explicitly denied by the corporate debtor. He also argued that once the resolution plan was approved, the NCLT ceased to have jurisdiction, and the possession claim became unnecessary. Additionally, he raised a technical objection that the RP had dropped monetary claims under the application during the hearing but still pursued the possession claim. He also contended that the pending application under Sections 45 and 48, which sought to challenge the Conducting Agreement as a preferential transaction, created an overlapping issue.

The NCLAT rejected all the arguments put forward by the appellant. It noted that the agreement expired in August 2023. Even if there was an expectation of extension, that hope was rendered void once the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC came into effect with the commencement of CIRP. The Tribunal clarified that during the moratorium, the affairs and properties of the corporate debtor remain frozen, and no unilateral expectation of extension can override that legal status. The Tribunal also found no merit in the argument that the NCLT had lost jurisdiction after the approval of the resolution plan. It cited previous judgments, such as Jhanvi Rajput Automotive Pvt. Ltd. v. RP of Rajpal Abhikaran Pvt. Ltd., to reaffirm that the Adjudicating Authority retains powers under Section 60 of the IBC even post-resolution, especially when it concerns properties of the corporate debtor.

Holding that the appellant’s possession ceased to be lawful once the agreement expired, and that there was no vested right to continue occupying the property post-CIRP, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the NCLT’s directive for eviction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)?

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) is an appellate body established under the Companies Act, 2013, to hear appeals against the orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). It deals with matters related to insolvency, company law, and other corporate issues.

What is the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)?

The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is a process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) that aims to revive a financially distressed company. It involves the appointment of a resolution professional to manage the company's affairs and the formulation of a resolution plan to either revive or liquidate the company.

What is the role of a resolution professional (RP) in insolvency proceedings?

A resolution professional (RP) is appointed during the CIRP to manage the affairs of the corporate debtor. The RP's role includes reviewing the company's assets and liabilities, preparing a resolution plan, and ensuring the process is conducted in a transparent and fair manner.

What happens when a resolution plan is approved under the IBC?

When a resolution plan is approved under the IBC, the successful resolution applicant takes over the management of the corporate debtor. The approved plan outlines the strategy to revive the company, including the payment of debts and the continuation of business operations.

What is a preferential transaction in the context of insolvency?

A preferential transaction in the context of insolvency is a transaction that gives one creditor an advantage over other creditors. Under the IBC, such transactions can be challenged to ensure fair distribution of the corporate debtor's assets among all creditors.

Related News Articles

Vashi: Navi Mumbai's Top Choice for Real Estate Investment in June
real estate news

Vashi: Navi Mumbai's Top Choice for Real Estate Investment in June

Discover why Vashi has emerged as a prime commercial and residential hub in Navi Mumbai, offering a comfortable living environment and diverse real estate opportunities.

July 17, 2024
Read Article
Unlocking the Potential of Real Estate CMA Software: Market Trends and Insights
Real Estate

Unlocking the Potential of Real Estate CMA Software: Market Trends and Insights

The real estate CMA software market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 10% over the next 5 years, driven by the increasing adoption of technology in the real estate industry. Key features of real estate CMA software include property data analysis, market tr

September 16, 2024
Read Article
SEBI Proposes New Rules to Simplify Operations and Standardize Disclosures for SM REITs
Real Estate

SEBI Proposes New Rules to Simplify Operations and Standardize Disclosures for SM REITs

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has proposed new rules to standardize disclosures and simplify the public issue process for Small and Medium Real Estate Investment Trusts (SM REITs). Introduced in March 2024, these trusts aim to attract

November 7, 2024
Read Article
Pune's Malnutrition Drive: 552 Children Identified, Strict Monitoring for Recovery
Real Estate Pune

Pune's Malnutrition Drive: 552 Children Identified, Strict Monitoring for Recovery

Pune's Malnutrition Drive has identified 552 children suffering from malnutrition. Strict monitoring and intervention are in place to ensure their recovery and improve their health conditions.

December 16, 2024
Read Article
Realty Stock with Impressive Revenue Guidance of ₹27,000 Cr for FY25 to Watch
Real Estate

Realty Stock with Impressive Revenue Guidance of ₹27,000 Cr for FY25 to Watch

This growth strategy highlights the company's commitment to scaling operations, tapping new markets, and driving sustained performance in the real estate sector...

December 21, 2024
Read Article
42% of 4.6 Lakh Homes Sold in Top Indian Cities Were Fresh Launches in 2024
Real Estate

42% of 4.6 Lakh Homes Sold in Top Indian Cities Were Fresh Launches in 2024

The Indian real estate market witnessed a notable trend in 2024, with 42% of the 4.6 lakh homes sold in the top seven cities being newly launched. This marks a significant shift in the housing sector.

March 6, 2025
Read Article