NCLT's Authority to Investigate Gift Deed Fraud in Oppression and Mismanagement Cases
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the jurisdiction to examine allegations of fraud related to a gift deed in cases involving oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act. This decision has significant implications for corporate governance and legal proceedings.
NcltCompanies ActOppressionMismanagementGift DeedReal EstateSep 09, 2025
Mrs. Shailja Krishna, the appellant, approached the NCLT claiming that her resignation and transfer of shares in Satori Global Limited had been obtained through fraud, coercion, and manipulation. The NCLT allowed her petition in 2018, restoring her as a director and shareholder. However, in 2023, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) set aside that decision, reasoning that issues of fraud and coercion could only be tried by a civil court.
The appellant’s counsel argued that Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 empowered the NCLT to inquire into acts of oppression and mismanagement, even if they involved fraudulent transfer of shares. They also contended that the gift deed was invalid under the Articles of Association, which did not permit the transfer of shares by way of gift to a mother-in-law. Additionally, they pointed out that the board meetings where her resignation was allegedly accepted were held without proper notice or quorum.
On the other hand, the respondents’ counsel argued that the NCLT had exceeded its jurisdiction in ruling on fraud and forgery, which required a full civil trial with oral evidence. They also maintained that the appellant had validly resigned and transferred her shares, and that her later complaints were delayed and without merit.
The bench, comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, observed that the NCLT has wide powers to decide matters incidental to complaints of oppression and mismanagement. They explained that refusing to exercise this jurisdiction would defeat the purpose of the law. The court pointed out that the gift deed violated the company’s Articles of Association and that the surrounding circumstances, including altered share transfer forms and irregular board meetings, demonstrated oppression and mismanagement.
The court held that the gift deed and share transfers were invalid, that the board meetings of 15 December 2010 and 17 December 2010 were conducted illegally, and that the appellant was unlawfully removed from management. Consequently, the judgment of the NCLAT was set aside, and the NCLT’s order was restored.
The court allowed the appeals and directed that the appellant be reinstated as a director and shareholder, with all consequential reliefs. Parties were directed to bear their own costs. This decision underscores the NCLT’s authority to address complex corporate disputes, ensuring that acts of oppression and mismanagement are thoroughly examined and rectified.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NCLT's role in corporate disputes?
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is a specialized quasi-judicial body in India that deals with corporate disputes, including issues of oppression and mismanagement, mergers, and insolvency proceedings.
What are Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act?
Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013) empower the NCLT to inquire into acts of oppression and mismanagement in companies.
What is the difference between NCLT and NCLAT?
The NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) is the first instance quasi-judicial body for corporate disputes, while the NCLAT (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) is the appellate body that hears appeals against NCLT decisions.
What is a gift deed in the context of corporate law?
A gift deed is a legal document used to transfer ownership of property or shares from one person to another without consideration. In corporate law, it can be used to transfer shares, but it must comply with the company's Articles of Association.
What happens if a gift deed is found to be invalid?
If a gift deed is found to be invalid, the transfer of property or shares is nullified, and the original owner retains the rights to the property or shares. This can lead to the restoration of the original status quo, as seen in the case of Mrs. Shailja Krishna.
Related News Articles
Budget 2024: Real Estate Sector Seeks Reforms and Incentives for Growth
Business News / Budget Expectations / Real Estate Sector Hopes for GST Rate Reductions and More
Bollywood's Rising Real Estate Investors: Actresses Leading the Charge
Bollywood actresses like Tamannaah Bhatia and Triptii Dimri are making waves in the Mumbai real estate market with significant investments, reflecting their growing financial power and strategic thinking.
Greece Sees Surge in Property Buying by Indians Ahead of Law Amendment
Leptos Estates reports 37% surge in property sales to Indian buyers, ahead of expected amendments to investment laws by the Greek government.
Top Stocks to Watch on March 18: Bajaj Finserv, Aditya Birla Real Estate, Swiggy, NBCC, and More
March 18 brings a lineup of stocks to watch, including Bajaj Finserv, Aditya Birla Real Estate, Swiggy, NBCC, and Suryoday Small Finance Bank. Here's what investors should know.
How Trump's Trade War May Impact Real Estate in Bangalore and Pune
The ongoing trade war between the USA and China has sparked recession fears, affecting the Indian IT sector and real estate markets in Bangalore and Pune. This article explores the potential challenges and changes these cities may face.
Drug Intoxication Leads to One Death, Two Hospitalizations in Hyderabad
A tragic incident in Hyderabad has resulted in the death of one individual and the hospitalization of two others due to drug intoxication. Details on the incident and safety measures are discussed below.