PIL's Impact: Transforming Delhi's Digital Courts to Tackle Cheque Bounce Delays
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by UN Legal Group has led to significant reforms in Delhi's digital courts, addressing long-standing issues of pendency and connectivity in cheque bounce cases.
Public Interest LitigationDigital CourtsCheque Bounce CasesJudicial ReformsDelhi High CourtReal EstateJun 03, 2025
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Delhi High Court has led to meaningful judicial reforms in the handling of cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, particularly in the North District of Delhi. The PIL was filed by Jagriti Jain, founding partner of UN Legal Group, highlighting administrative lapses that were hampering the efficiency of the Digital NI Act Court in the district.
The PIL, numbered W.P.(C) 5368/2024, raised concerns over the excessive pendency, more than 8,000 cases before the only designated Digital NI Act Court in the North District. The petition also flagged persistent connectivity issues with the Layers portal, which is used for digital case hearings. These technical shortcomings, coupled with listing delays of up to ten months, were undermining the intended efficiency of digital adjudication.
The petitioner further sought directions for framing regulations to ensure better network infrastructure and a reduction in the long intervals between listings at the ‘consideration’ stage in cheque bounce cases.
On April 16, 2024, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice Manmohan (Then Acting Chief Justice) and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued directions to the respondents to examine and address the pendency and technical issues raised in the petition.
In compliance, the Registrar General of the High Court submitted a status report on May 9, 2024, outlining the remedial measures undertaken. A second Digital NI Act Court was established in the North District to help manage the case load. The pending matters were evenly distributed between the two digital courts.
For resolving the connectivity issues, the concerned Judicial Officer was relocated from a camp office to a chamber within the court complex. This move resolved the VPN-related network problems that had been affecting access to the Layers portal.
After being informed of these developments, counsel for the petitioner acknowledged that the grievance had been addressed. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
While the petition was formally disposed of in 2024, the impact of the High Court’s directions has become evident in 2025. Administrative changes initiated as a result of the PIL have visibly improved the functioning of the courts:
I. Exclusive Digital NI Act Courts Improve Case Disposal
The creation of dedicated Digital NI Act Courts marked a significant shift in the judicial approach to cheque bounce matters. These courts operate virtually and are equipped with digital tools that streamline case scheduling and reduce delays between filing and the first hearing. The focused nature of these courts has led to domain-specific familiarity among judicial officers, resulting in faster and more consistent adjudication.
For litigants and lawyers, the virtual format has eased logistical challenges and improved accessibility to justice.
II. Additional Judges and Redistribution of Workload
The High Court also appointed additional Metropolitan Magistrates and redistributed pending matters, which helped balance the workload across courtrooms. Prior to the intervention, one digital court was managing an unsustainable number of cases. With two functioning courts and fresh appointments, pendency has begun to reduce, and long-delayed cases are finally moving forward.
III. Hybrid Model Adopted for Select Cases
Recognizing that not all cases are best handled online, especially those requiring cross-examination or negotiation, courts have begun transitioning certain matters back to physical hearings. This hybrid approach allows efficiency gains to continue through digital platforms while safeguarding procedural fairness and enhancing participation for litigants unfamiliar with technology.
This case illustrates how public-spirited litigation can serve as a powerful instrument for systemic reform. The PIL, drafted and argued by Ms. Jagriti Jain and Mr. Parthesh Bhardwaj of UN Legal Group, brought much-needed attention to the challenges faced in the digital judicial environment and has directly contributed to long-term improvements in the justice delivery system.
The UN Legal Group emphasized that the role of litigation must go beyond individual client outcomes; it must serve to strengthen institutional accountability and governance. The reforms triggered by this PIL reflect exactly that.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL)?
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is a legal action initiated in a court of law for the protection of public interest, such as violation of basic human rights of the poor or a matter of significant public importance.
How many cheque bounce cases were pending before the Digital NI Act Court in the North District of Delhi?
More than 8,000 cheque bounce cases were pending before the only designated Digital NI Act Court in the North District of Delhi.
What technical issues were highlighted in the PIL?
The PIL highlighted persistent connectivity issues with the Layers portal, which is used for digital case hearings, and listing delays of up to ten months.
What measures did the Delhi High Court take to address the issues raised in the PIL?
The Delhi High Court directed the establishment of a second Digital NI Act Court in the North District, the appointment of additional Metropolitan Magistrates, and the relocation of the concerned Judicial Officer to resolve connectivity issues.
What is the impact of these reforms in 2025?
The reforms have led to improved case disposal, reduced pendency, and the adoption of a hybrid model for select cases, enhancing both efficiency and procedural fairness in the digital judicial environment.
Related News Articles
Union Budget 2024: A Mixed Bag for the Real Estate Market
Real estate experts weigh in on the Union Budget 2024, analyzing the provisions introduced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman for the sector.
No Major Impact on Sales: DLF's Take on Indexation Benefit Removal
DLF says removal of indexation benefit will not affect sales, despite concerns from real estate experts.
Mumbai’s Light Vehicle Toll Waiver to Boost Real Estate in Key Suburbs
The recent announcement of toll waivers for light motor vehicles in Mumbai is expected to enhance the real estate market in suburban areas such as Thane, Airoli, and Vashi, making these locations more appealing to homebuyers. Stay tuned for further update
Maharashtra Election 2024: Top 5 Expectations for Mumbai Homebuyers
Mumbai's real estate market stands out in India with residential property rates starting from ₹20,000 per sq ft. Here are the top 5 expectations homebuyers have from the upcoming Maharashtra election.
Mumbai Sees Surge in Property Registrations, Collects Rs 825 Crore in Stamp Duty in November 2024
In the 11 months of 2024, Mumbai witnessed 127,987 property registrations, reflecting a 12% year-on-year increase.
From Cricket Pitch to Boardroom: Aryaman Vikram Birla’s Remarkable Journey
In an exclusive interview, Rahul Kanwal, Executive Director of Business Today, sits down with Aryaman Vikram Birla, Director at Aditya Birla Management, to discuss his inspiring journey from the cricket field to the boardroom.