Pune: Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions in NDA Land Dispute
The Bombay High Court has dismissed several petitions, including two public interest litigations (PILs), challenging the development rights granted to a private builder for the rehabilitation of residents from Kopare village in Pune.
PuneNdaLand DisputeBombay High CourtRehabilitationReal Estate PuneNov 03, 2025
The land, originally acquired during World War II and later for the establishment of the National Defence Academy (NDA), has been the subject of a long-standing dispute. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad ruled that the allegations raised—pertaining to fraud, forgery, and manipulation of land records—were issues of fact that could only be determined through a civil trial, not in a PIL.
“The allegations of forgery and manipulation of records shall be subject to scrutiny before the civil court, where both sides can present evidence. It is a well-established principle that disputes over immovable property cannot be adjudicated through writ petitions,” the bench observed in its recent order.
The land in question was first requisitioned by the British government in 1942 during the Second World War and subsequently acquired in 1951 for the NDA. To resettle the displaced families, the government allocated land at Mouje Hingane Budruk in 1961. Four decades later, in 2001, the redevelopment project was handed over to Kakade Construction Company Pvt Ltd through an agreement with the villagers.
However, in 2018, a group claiming to be descendants of the original affected families approached the court, alleging large-scale irregularities by the developer. They accused the company of manipulating land documents and failing to fulfill promises made under the rehabilitation scheme. Their plea was heard along with another petition from 2019 and two PILs filed in 2009 and 2023 by social organizations.
The bench noted that a report submitted by the Pune district collector in April 2013 showed that 315 out of 350 affected families had already been allotted housing units. The court directed the developer to ensure compliance with the report and facilitate accommodation for the remaining 35 families. Advocates Prathamesh Bhargude, Prabhakar Jadhav, and Sanjay Koban represented the petitioners, while advocate Karan Bhosale appeared for the developer. Bhosale informed the court that six of the remaining 35 families had already been offered possession.
The judges also pointed out that the rehabilitation project was nearing completion, and any drastic order at this stage would derail years of development work. “At this stage, when the project is almost complete, passing any order that would nullify the entire rehabilitation process is neither feasible nor justifiable. The petitioners have an alternate legal remedy through civil proceedings,” the court stated, dismissing the petitions as not maintainable.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main issue in the NDA land dispute?
The main issue in the NDA land dispute is the development rights granted to a private builder for the rehabilitation of residents from Kopare village in Pune, with allegations of fraud, forgery, and manipulation of land records.
Who were the petitioners in the case?
The petitioners in the case include a group claiming to be descendants of the original affected families and social organizations that filed public interest litigations (PILs).
What did the Bombay High Court rule?
The Bombay High Court ruled that the allegations of fraud and forgery are issues of fact that can only be determined through a civil trial, not through public interest litigations (PILs).
How many families have been resettled so far?
According to a report submitted by the Pune district collector in April 2013, 315 out of 350 affected families have already been allotted housing units.
What was the court's final decision?
The court dismissed the petitions as not maintainable, stating that the petitioners have an alternate legal remedy through civil proceedings and that passing any order to nullify the entire rehabilitation process is neither feasible nor justifiable.
Related News Articles
India's Middle Class Deserves Better: Reinstate Real Estate Indexation Benefits, Says Mohandas Pai
Veteran business leader Mohandas Pai urges the government to reconsider its decision to scrap indexation benefits for real estate transactions, citing the negative impact on the middle class.
Mystery Deepens: Body of Missing Nerul Real Estate Agent Found, Another Still Unaccounted For
Raigad police discover the body of one of the two missing Nerul real estate agents, while the search for the second agent continues.
PVR INOX to Unlock Value from Prime Real Estate Assets
PVR INOX plans to monetize non-core real estate assets in prime locations such as Mumbai, Pune, and Vadodara, as part of its growth strategy.
Apple iPhone 16 Plus Review: Big Screen, Affordable Price
The Apple iPhone 16 Plus delivers exceptional performance and a large, vibrant display at a price point that won't break the bank. Benchmark scores and real-world usage demonstrate its outstanding speed and efficiency.
Maharashtra Schools Introduce Strict Medical Emergency Guidelines for Student Safety
The Maharashtra government has introduced comprehensive medical emergency guidelines for all schools, aiming to enhance student safety and well-being. This initiative follows a tragic incident and aligns with a Bombay High Court order.
The Unregulated Real Estate Market in Kashmir: A Growing Concern
The lack of regulation, enforcement, and planning in the real estate sector in Kashmir poses significant challenges, threatening the sustainability, transparency, and fairness of the industry.