Supreme Court Mandates Reforms in Real Estate Sector to Protect Homebuyers
The Supreme Court has issued a series of directives aimed at protecting homebuyers and reforming the real estate sector, emphasizing the fundamental right to shelter and stressing the need for transparency and accountability.
Real EstateSupreme CourtHomebuyersReformsHousingReal EstateSep 13, 2025
Issuing the ruling in a batch of appeals arising out of a National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) decision on a housing project in Greater Noida, a bench of justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan stressed that a home is not merely a roof over one’s head, but a reflection of one’s hopes and dreams.
“The plight of tax-paying middle-class citizens paints a disheartening picture…Having invested their lifelong savings in pursuit of a home, many are compelled to shoulder a double burden, servicing EMIs on one hand, and paying rent on the other, only to find their ‘dream home’ reduced to an unfinished building. The anxiety of not having a home despite paying a fortune is bound to take a serious toll on health, productivity, and dignity,” it rued.
Noting that “housing is neither a luxury nor a speculative instrument, but a fundamental human need,” the bench issued a wide-ranging set of 12 binding directions, which included strengthening tribunals by filling up vacancies in NCLT and NCLAT “on a war footing,” with additional benches constituted to deal with real estate insolvencies. The Centre has been directed to file a compliance report within three months on upgrading tribunal infrastructure, after instances such as water seepage had forced closure of NCLT courtrooms in Delhi.
Within three months, the bench ordered, a committee chaired by a retired high court judge and comprising officials from the law and housing ministries, NITI Aayog, National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), IIMs and industry representatives, will recommend systemic reforms for credibility and transparency in the sector.
The government has been further directed to consider expanding the SWAMIH (Special Window for Affordable and Mid-Income Housing) Fund or setting up a special revival fund under National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) to provide last-mile financing for stalled projects, with CAG audits to ensure accountability.
States must equip RERA authorities with adequate staff, legal experts, and resources, and ensure that approvals are not given without thorough diligence, said the court, warning that lapses would be “unpardonable in law.”
According to the judgment, insolvency proceedings must be conducted project-wise, not across entire corporate entities, to protect solvent projects and genuine allottees. NCLTs must verify at the admission stage whether an applicant is a genuine homebuyer or a speculative investor.
Furthermore, the judgment mandated escrow accounts for funds in nascent projects, representation of allottees in committee of creditors (CoCs), and registration of transactions with revenue authorities once at least 20% payment is made. Contracts for senior citizens that deviate from the model RERA agreement will require sworn affidavits of risk awareness.
The bench flagged the dangers of treating housing like speculative instruments such as stocks or debentures. Citing comparative experiences from Western countries where speculation has led to housing crises, the court cautioned that India must act now to avoid similar pitfalls.
“Ensuring timely project completion must be a cornerstone of India’s urban policy. Equally, the State must proactively address the menace of a parallel cash economy and speculative practices in the real estate market, which artificially inflate housing costs and jeopardize the interests of genuine end-users,” the judgment said.
Beyond its binding directions, the bench suggested broader reforms, including a consultative exercise to bring uniformity in RERA rules across states, dedicated wings in housing boards and urban authorities to revive stalled projects, strengthened collaboration with Indian think tanks and institutions like IIMs and IITs to build domestic capacity for restructuring and consideration of a dedicated corporate entity, on the lines of NARCL, to take over and complete stalled projects, with unsold inventory channelled into affordable housing schemes.
In emphatic terms, the court reiterated that housing cannot be reduced to a contractual entitlement. “The right to secure, peaceful, and timely possession of one’s home is a facet of the fundamental right to shelter enshrined under Article 21,” declared the bench.
Drawing a parallel to the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case on the basic structure doctrine, the court said: “As in the culmination of Kesavananda Bharati, where ‘Kesavananda lost but the country won,’ the larger interest of the sector and genuine allottees must prevail over narrower considerations.”
The registry was directed to circulate a copy of the judgment to the cabinet secretary and all state chief secretaries for immediate action.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main focus of the Supreme Court's ruling?
The main focus of the Supreme Court's ruling is to protect homebuyers and reform the real estate sector by emphasizing the fundamental right to shelter and addressing speculative practices that have left many projects stalled.
What are the key directions issued by the Supreme Court?
Key directions include strengthening tribunals, setting up a committee for systemic reforms, expanding the SWAMIH Fund, equipping RERA authorities, conducting insolvency proceedings project-wise, and mandating escrow accounts and representation of allottees.
How does the Supreme Court view the role of housing in society?
The Supreme Court views housing as a fundamental human need, not a luxury or speculative instrument, and emphasizes that the right to secure, peaceful, and timely possession of one’s home is a facet of the fundamental right to shelter.
What is the significance of the SWAMIH Fund in this ruling?
The SWAMIH Fund is significant as the Supreme Court has directed the government to consider expanding it or setting up a special revival fund under NARCL to provide last-mile financing for stalled projects, ensuring accountability through CAG audits.
What broader reforms does the court suggest beyond its binding directions?
The court suggests broader reforms including uniformity in RERA rules across states, dedicated wings in housing boards to revive stalled projects, and collaboration with think tanks and institutions to build domestic capacity for restructuring.
Related News Articles
Pune's PCNTDA Residents to Get Freehold Status, Promises Maharashtra Minister Uday Samant
Maharashtra Minister Uday Samant has assured PCNTDA residents that a decision will be made on freehold status without causing financial loss to the state government.
Veriff Boosts Biometric Security to Combat Account Takeover Fraud
Biometric authentication, account takeover fraud, identity verification, facial recognition, fraud prevention
Inside Mumbai's Luxurious Abodes: A Glimpse into the Homes of India's Elite
Mumbai, often dubbed the 'Billionaire Capital of Asia,' boasts a real estate landscape that mirrors its status as India's commercial and financial hub. From opulent mansions to sleek high-rises, the city is home to some of the most stunning and expensive
Kapil Sharma: From Rs 500 Salary to Rs 300 Crore Net Worth
Kapil Sharma, the king of Indian comedy, has come a long way from his humble beginnings. Today, he owns luxurious properties and cars, and his net worth is estimated at Rs 300 crore. Explore his inspiring journey from rags to riches.
Mumbai and Delhi Emerge as Leading Luxury Real Estate Markets in Asia-Pacific
India's real estate sector is witnessing a significant boom, driven by robust economic growth, infrastructure improvements, and changing lifestyle trends. Mumbai and Delhi, in particular, are ranking among the fastest-growing luxury real estate markets in
Important Steps to Ensure Your Apartment is Free from Legal Issues Before Purchase
MahaRERA has recently directed a real estate developer near Mumbai to disclose details about any pending litigation to the public. This highlights the importance of checking for legal issues before buying an apartment.