Supreme Court Upholds ITC Eligibility for Real Estate in Safari Retreats Case
The Supreme Court has dismissed the government’s review petition in the Safari Retreats case, affirming that input tax credit (ITC) can be claimed on construction costs for commercial properties used for leasing.
Input Tax CreditGstReal EstateSupreme CourtSafari RetreatsReal EstateMay 22, 2025
In a landmark judgment, the Court upheld that ITC cannot be denied on construction costs if immovable property—like shopping malls—is used for taxable supplies such as leasing. The ruling introduced a functionality test, allowing credit where assets facilitate business operations.
According to tax experts, the Supreme Court’s refusal to entertain the review brings much-needed clarity and relief to the industry, particularly sectors such as real estate, infrastructure, and leasing, where blocked credit provisions have had a far-reaching impact.
Taxpayers must now assert their rightful claims, backed by judicial precedent and a comprehensive reading of the statute,” says Abhishek A Rastogi, Founder, Rastogi Chambers, who had argued on the constitutional validity before the Supreme Court.
However, the government’s attempt to nullify the ruling through a retrospective legislative amendment undermines judicial finality and introduces significant uncertainty. It may open the floodgates for litigation and erode taxpayer confidence.
The industry now stands at a crossroads -- while the judgment offers clarity and relief, the retrospective amendment, if enacted, could dilute its benefit. Businesses must carefully monitor future legislative developments before relying on this ruling for ITC claims on leased properties,” says Rajat Mohan, Senior Partner, AMRG & Associates.
It must be noted that the GST Council’s 55th meeting proposed amending Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, replacing “plant or machinery” with “plant and machinery” retrospectively from July 2017. The Centre claims this corrects a “drafting error,” but experts warn it undermines judicial authority.
The Safari Retreats case deals with the eligibility of ITC for immovable property, particularly commercial properties like shopping malls meant for leasing/renting. Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act prohibits real estate companies from claiming ITC on the GST paid for goods and services used in constructing properties meant for their own purpose even if the same was rented out.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Safari Retreats case about?
The Safari Retreats case deals with the eligibility of input tax credit (ITC) for immovable property, particularly commercial properties like shopping malls meant for leasing/renting. The case challenged the prohibition on claiming ITC on GST paid for goods and services used in constructing properties meant for their own purpose, even if the same was rented out.
What did the Supreme Court rule in the Safari Retreats case?
The Supreme Court ruled that input tax credit (ITC) cannot be denied on construction costs if the immovable property, such as shopping malls, is used for taxable supplies like leasing. The Court introduced a functionality test, allowing credit where assets facilitate business operations.
How does this ruling impact the real estate industry?
The ruling brings much-needed clarity and relief to the real estate industry, particularly sectors such as real estate, infrastructure, and leasing. It allows companies to claim ITC on construction costs for commercial properties used for leasing, reducing their tax burden and improving cash flow.
What is the government's stance on this ruling?
The government has attempted to nullify the ruling through a retrospective legislative amendment, which proposes to amend Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The Centre claims this corrects a 'drafting error,' but experts warn that it undermines judicial authority and introduces significant uncertainty.
What should businesses do in light of this ruling and the proposed amendment?
Businesses should carefully monitor future legislative developments before relying on this ruling for ITC claims on leased properties. While the judgment offers clarity and relief, the retrospective amendment, if enacted, could dilute its benefit and lead to further litigation.
Related News Articles
Telangana RERA Mandates Refund to Homebuyer and Imposes ₹9.96 Lakh Penalty on Builder
The Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) has ordered a builder to refund a homebuyer and imposed a penalty of ₹9.96 lakh for not adhering to the terms of the agreement and failing to comply with RERA regulations.
ABREL-Owned Birla Estates Reports Rs 8,000 Cr Booking Value for FY25
ABREL-owned Birla Estates has reported a booking value of Rs 8,000 crore for FY25, indicating strong demand in key real estate markets such as Mumbai, Pune, NCR, and Bengaluru. The company is optimistic about its future sales targets for FY26.
Tariff War Fallout: Bengaluru and Pune Sound Alarm on Housing Slump Linked to US Recession
India's housing market has witnessed a significant downturn in the first quarter of 2025, with a 23% drop in sales and a 34% fall in new housing supply, particularly affecting major cities like Bengaluru and Pune.
Why Bengaluru is a Top Choice for North Indians Looking for a New Home
While every city has its own set of pros and cons, with skyrocketing property prices in Mumbai and poor air quality in Delhi, Bengaluru stands out as a preferred destination for many North Indians. Here’s why.
BMC Targets 500 Defaulters, Including Prominent Developers, for Unpaid Property Taxes in Mumbai
The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has taken a strict stance against 500 defaulters, including prominent developers, for non-payment of property taxes. The civic body has issued notices to attach their properties if the dues are not settled with
ED Launches Raids on AAP MLA Kulwant Singh's Estate in Mohali
A significant crackdown has been initiated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on the palatial residence of AAP MLA Kulwant Singh in Mohali. Known for his vast wealth and real estate ventures, Singh's assets are estimated to be worth Rs 1000 crore.