BMC Issues Notice to Mithun Chakraborty for Alleged Illegal Construction in Mumbai
The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has issued a legal notice to veteran Bollywood actor Mithun Chakraborty, alleging unauthorized construction at his property in Erangal village, Malad West. The notice, issued under Section 351 (1A) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, demands proof of legality within seven days.
BmcMithun ChakrabortyIllegal ConstructionErangal VillageMalad WestReal Estate MumbaiMay 18, 2025
The civic body has demanded proof that the construction is authorized and complies with municipal laws. The BMC claims that Mithun has allegedly constructed a ground-floor structure without appropriate approvals, violating building norms. The notice demands an explanation and proof of authorization within seven days from the date of issuance. Failure to comply may lead to demolition of the said structure and further legal proceedings under municipal and state property laws.
Erangal village, a coastal locality in Malad West, is known for its traditional architecture and scenic views. It has recently become a target for unauthorized real estate development, often under the radar due to its proximity to the coastline and forest areas. The BMC has launched a crackdown on illegal structures in this zone, identifying over 100 unauthorized constructions, many of which are built using forged documents or without environmental clearance. The municipal authority has set a target to demolish these structures by the end of May 2025 as part of a larger anti-encroachment drive.
Responding to media inquiries, Mithun Chakraborty has denied all allegations of illegal construction. He claimed that his property complies with all legal requirements and that several other residents in the area have received similar notices. Mithun emphasized that the structure in question is residential and that he is fully prepared to cooperate with the authorities.
Over the last few years, the BMC has come under pressure to enforce construction laws more strictly, especially in areas that fall under coastal regulation zones (CRZs), forest buffers, or reserved plots. High-profile cases involving celebrities and political figures often trigger public scrutiny, leading to legal mandates for transparency and accountability. The crackdown aims to ensure urban planning standards are upheld, prevent ecological damage in protected areas, and stop the regularization of illegal structures through political lobbying or delayed legal loopholes.
In areas like Erangal and Marve, illegal construction has reportedly led to strain on civic infrastructure, unauthorized land encroachments, and conflicts between locals and developers. Mithun Chakraborty is not the first celebrity to come under BMC’s radar. Previously, several Bollywood stars and public figures have faced similar issues, including Shah Rukh Khan, Kangana Ranaut, and Kapil Sharma. These cases underscore the municipal corporation’s increased vigilance in regulating Mumbai’s densely packed and rapidly expanding urban landscape.
Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, empowers the civic body to inspect properties suspected of illegal construction, issue notices demanding proof of legality, and demolish any unauthorized part of the structure if satisfactory documents are not submitted within the given period. In Mithun Chakraborty’s case, the legal process is still ongoing, but the BMC’s warning indicates zero tolerance for non-compliance, regardless of the person’s stature or celebrity status.
If Mithun fails to submit valid construction approvals, several outcomes may follow, including immediate demolition of the illegal portion, imposition of penalties or fines under municipal and state building codes, and potential legal proceedings. The public reaction to this case has been divided, with supporters of Mithun standing by him and critics calling for strict enforcement of the law.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the BMC issue a notice to Mithun Chakraborty?
The BMC issued a notice to Mithun Chakraborty for alleged unauthorized construction at his property in Erangal village, Malad West. The notice demands proof of legality within seven days.
What is Section 351 (1A) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act?
Section 351 (1A) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act empowers the civic body to inspect properties suspected of illegal construction, issue notices demanding proof of legality, and demolish any unauthorized part of the structure if satisfactory documents are not submitted within the given period.
What are the potential legal implications for Mithun Chakraborty?
If Mithun fails to submit valid construction approvals, the potential legal implications include immediate demolition of the illegal portion, imposition of penalties or fines, and potential legal proceedings.
Why is the BMC intensifying its drive against unauthorized buildings?
The BMC is intensifying its drive against unauthorized buildings to ensure urban planning standards are upheld, prevent ecological damage in protected areas, and stop the regularization of illegal structures through political lobbying or delayed legal loopholes.
What is the public reaction to this case?
The public reaction to this case has been divided, with supporters of Mithun standing by him and critics calling for strict enforcement of the law.
Related News Articles
Unlocking $48 Billion in Indian Office Space: The Rise of Fractional Ownership
India's fractional ownership market is expected to exceed $5 billion by 2030
Budget 2024: Reviving Affordable Housing - A Sector in Crisis
The real estate sector is seeking 'high-impact' measures to revive affordable housing, including special schemes, tax breaks, and revised pricing definitions.
Can Urbanization and Nature Coexist? A New Vision for Cities
As cities expand, natural spaces are dwindling. But is it possible to create a symbiosis between urbanization and nature? We explore the possibilities.
Market Sentiment Remains Robust Amidst Fresh IPOs: Anand Tandon
Anand Tandon shares his insights on the current market sentiment, IPOs, and sectors to watch out for.
MahaRERA Orders Developers to Refund Buyers Amid Complaints Over Pending Home Sales
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has taken action against developers in Pune, a region heavily affected by pending home sales. MahaRERA has ordered developers to refund buyers to address the growing complaints.
Tayal Corp: Pioneering Architectural Excellence in Pune's Real Estate Market
Led by Ar. Sumit Tayal, Tayal Corp. is not just another real estate developer; it is a collective of thinkers, visionaries, and problem-solvers. Discover how this innovative company is transforming the landscape of Pune's real estate industry.