MahaRERA Orders Ghatkopar Developer to Refund ₹1.89 Crore to Flat Buyers
The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has directed Rare Townships Private Limited to refund two flat buyers the full amount they paid, along with interest, for apartments in the North Sea Heights (A1) project.
MahareraReal EstateGhatkoparFlat BuyersRefundReal Estate MumbaiSep 12, 2025
Apart from the principal amount, the developer has also been ordered to pay interest at the rate of the State Bank of India’s highest Marginal Cost Lending Rate (MCLR) plus 2%, as prescribed under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, from the date of payments until actual realization.
The complainant couple had initially booked Flat No. 705 in 2012 after assurances from the developer’s sales representatives. A first payment of Rs 5 lakh was made on December 31, 2012. Later, through a registered agreement for sale dated November 2, 2015, the booking was shifted to Flats No. 1503 and 1504.
The developer had promised possession by December 31, 2018. However, even years later, the flats remained incomplete, with construction at a standstill and municipal approvals not in place. By then, the couple had paid a total of Rs 1.89 crore, including charges and taxes. Aggrieved by the delay, they approached MahaRERA seeking a refund with interest and compensation.
Rare Townships argued that the complaints were not maintainable due to an arbitration clause in the agreement signed before RERA came into force. The developer claimed the complainants defaulted on payments, and that 85% of the project was completed with statutory approvals. It further cited financial stress caused by over 60% of allottees defaulting, invoking force majeure in 2019 to extend possession deadlines. The developer maintained that compelling it to refund would divert funds and affect genuine allottees.
Rejecting these arguments, MahaRERA observed: “Even on the extended date, the project was incomplete, and possession was not handed over to the complainants. It shows that the respondent has violated the provisions of Section 18 of RERA. Hence, the complainants are entitled to seek refund along with interest.”
The authority ruled that the builder’s justifications for delay had “no legal substance” since construction was still not complete. Advocate Mithil Sampat, appearing for the complainants, told FPJ: “The Honourable RERA authorities have rightly held that there is no legal substance in the reasons for delay given by the builder.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MahaRERA?
MahaRERA stands for Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority. It is a regulatory body established under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, to protect the interests of home buyers and promote a transparent real estate market in Maharashtra.
Why did the complainants approach MahaRERA?
The complainants approached MahaRERA because the developer, Rare Townships Private Limited, failed to deliver possession of their flats by the promised date, despite receiving full payments.
What did the developer claim in their defense?
The developer claimed that the complaints were not maintainable due to an arbitration clause in the agreement signed before RERA came into force. They also argued that the complainants had defaulted on payments and that 85% of the project was completed with statutory approvals.
What was MahaRERA's ruling on the developer's defense?
MahaRERA rejected the developer's arguments, stating that the project was still incomplete and possession was not handed over to the complainants. They ruled that the developer had violated the provisions of Section 18 of RERA.
What is the significance of this ruling for other home buyers?
This ruling sets a precedent for other home buyers facing similar issues with developers. It emphasizes the importance of regulatory bodies like MahaRERA in protecting the rights of home buyers and ensuring that developers adhere to their commitments.
Related News Articles
Pharma Giant Cipla Slapped with ₹774 Crore Income Tax Demand Amid New Obesity Drug Launch
Mumbai-based Cipla faces massive income tax demand of ₹774 crore over rule violations, including short deductions and disallowance of expenses, amid the launch of its new obesity drug.
Mahindra Sells 20.5 Acres of Land in Mumbai's Kandivali Area for ₹210 Crore
The Kandivali east micro market, where the land parcel is located, commands a per sq ft rate of ₹25,000 to ₹35,000 for the residential segment. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd has sold the land to Blueprintify Properties Pvt Ltd, part of Pune-based real estate
Uttar Pradesh Government Approves Real Estate Projects Worth Rs 7,200 Crore
The Uttar Pradesh government has given the green light to several real estate projects worth a total of Rs 7,200 crore. These projects are expected to provide a significant boost to the state's infrastructure and economy.
Amitabh Bachchan and Son Abhishek Purchase Luxurious Properties in Mulund Worth ₹24.95 Crore
Father-son duo Abhishek and Amitabh Bachchan have bought properties in Mulund West, Mumbai, worth Rs 24.95 crore. The luxurious property is within a high-end project and boasts modern amenities and sophisticated design.
What About the Millions of Vehicles Already on the Road? Experts Weigh In on Maharashtra's Upcoming Vehicle Emission Standards
As Maharashtra gears up to implement stricter vehicle emission standards, there are growing concerns about the fate of the millions of vehicles already plying the roads. Experts from various fields are offering their insights on how the state can navigate
Bengaluru Sees Rise in Rental Inventory, Leading to 5% Rent Correction
Bengaluru's rental market is experiencing a stabilization as an increase in rental inventory has led to a 5% correction in rent prices. Real estate brokers anticipate a more balanced market moving forward.