Mumbai Court Rescinds Eviction Order Against Consumer Organization

The Mumbai city civil court has overturned the eviction order against Mumbai Grahak Panchayat (MGP), a consumer body serving over 30,000 beneficiaries, by declaring it an unauthorized occupant of a municipal property.

Mumbai Grahak PanchayatMcgmEviction OrderRedevelopmentLeaseReal Estate MumbaiAug 28, 2025

Mumbai Court Rescinds Eviction Order Against Consumer Organization
Real Estate Mumbai:The Mumbai city civil court has provided significant relief to the consumer organization, Mumbai Grahak Panchayat (MGP), by setting aside the order that declared it an unauthorized occupant of a municipal property. This property, earmarked for redevelopment under the market development program, has been a subject of dispute.

The organization, which claims to serve over 30,000 beneficiaries, argued that it required permanent status in the property and could not be treated as a licensee instead of a lessee. The court's decision is a major victory for MGP, which has been fighting to retain its premises at Grahak Bhavan, located on Sant Dnyaneshwar Marg, behind Cooper Hospital.

The court criticized the Competent Authority for failing to exercise its powers to call for key documents from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and for ignoring crucial records supplied to the appellant under the RTI Act. The Principal Judge of the Sessions Court observed, 'The Competent Authority failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances in proper perspective and brushed aside important documents by merely saying that they are unsigned, without considering that the MCGM failed to explain the genesis and authenticity of these documents. In such circumstances, the impugned order requires interference.'

The court further noted that an organization serving over 30,000 beneficiaries would require some permanent status in the property and that labeling it as 'non-cooperative' was unjust. The Principal Judge stated, 'Thus, the action appears to have been initiated to assist the developer more than the MCGM. In such circumstances, there is no proper termination of the lease. The contention that the lease expired in 1996 cannot be accepted, nor can the ground of requirement of premises and alleged non-cooperation by the appellant for redevelopment. Hence, the claim that the appellants are unauthorized occupants cannot be accepted.'

The appeal was filed against the 2023 order that had allowed the MCGM to evict MGP from the leased property. According to the MCGM, the appellants were given the premises at Grahak Bhavan on lease in 1985. The civic body claimed that the lease expired in 1996, with no extension thereafter, making the appellants unauthorized occupants. The MCGM further contended that the property was required for the construction of a market and that the appellants failed to cooperate in the redevelopment process despite being given an option to do so.

In response, the appellants stated that the premises were given on a lease of 10 years with an extension of another 10 years. In 2004, an extension was granted for 30 years from 2001, making the lease valid until 2030. The appellants argued, 'Under pressure from the developer, the appellants are being evicted illegally and improperly. Considering these facts, they cannot be termed unauthorized occupants, and the proceedings are flawed with material discrepancies.'

The court, in its detailed judgment, held that the MCGM failed to prove termination or non-renewal of the lease, as no documentary evidence supported its claim. The Principal Judge noted, 'Records show that the appellant’s area was excluded from the original redevelopment plan, indicating that the lease continued during the proposal stage. Later inclusion of the plot appears to have been suggested by the developer, with the MCGM acting only as an intermediary. Questions arise on how the Municipal Commissioner allowed renewal in 2004 without placing it before the Improvement Committee and how official documents supporting renewal came into existence. If the occupation since 1996 was unauthorized, no action against officials has been explained. The appellant, serving over 30,000 beneficiaries, required permanent status and cannot be faulted for insisting on terms. Thus, allegations of non-cooperation and unauthorized occupation are untenable, and MCGM’s actions appear to favor the developer rather than follow due process.'

Consequently, the impugned order was quashed and set aside, giving major relief to the consumer organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Mumbai Grahak Panchayat?

Mumbai Grahak Panchayat (MGP) is a consumer body that serves over 30,000 beneficiaries. It operates from a leased property in Mumbai.

Why did the MCGM want to evict MGP?

The MCGM claimed that the lease for MGP's property expired in 1996 and that the property was required for the construction of a market. They also alleged that MGP failed to cooperate in the redevelopment process.

What did the court criticize the Competent Authority for?

The court criticized the Competent Authority for failing to exercise its powers to call for key documents from the MCGM and for ignoring crucial records supplied to the appellant under the RTI Act.

What was the court's decision on the lease renewal?

The court held that the MCGM failed to prove termination or non-renewal of the lease, as no documentary evidence supported its claim. The lease was extended in 2004, making it valid until 2030.

What is the significance of this court decision for MGP?

The court's decision to quash the eviction order provides major relief to MGP, allowing it to continue serving its beneficiaries from the leased property without being labeled as unauthorized occupants.

Related News Articles

Sunteck Realty Reports Net Profit of Rs 101.33 Crore in Q4 FY24
Real Estate

Sunteck Realty Reports Net Profit of Rs 101.33 Crore in Q4 FY24

Sunteck Realty's net consolidated total income stood at Rs 434.99 crore in Q4 FY24

May 31, 2024
Read Article
Due Process Must be Followed by Trademark Registrars in Examining Cases
Real Estate Mumbai

Due Process Must be Followed by Trademark Registrars in Examining Cases

The Mumbai High Court has ordered the Trademark Registry to re-examine a case involving the transfer of ownership of two trademarks, highlighting the importance of following due process in such cases.

June 28, 2024
Read Article
Prestige Estates to Launch 43 New Real Estate Projects Across 7 Cities
Real Estate Pune

Prestige Estates to Launch 43 New Real Estate Projects Across 7 Cities

The company has a total land bank of 260 acres across Bengaluru, Mangaluru, Mysuru, and Pune.

August 6, 2024
Read Article
Pune Real Estate Firm Falls Victim to Rs 24 Lakh Cyber Fraud
Real Estate Maharashtra

Pune Real Estate Firm Falls Victim to Rs 24 Lakh Cyber Fraud

An employee from the accounts department of a Pune-based real estate firm was tricked into transferring Rs 24 lakh to fraudulent accounts after receiving a message from someone posing as the company director’s father. The incident highlights the increasin

November 27, 2024
Read Article
How REITs and Fractional Ownership are Reshaping the Real Estate Market
real estate news

How REITs and Fractional Ownership are Reshaping the Real Estate Market

With minimum investment thresholds ranging from Rs 10-25 lakh, retail investors now have the opportunity to participate in the real estate market with limited capital.

November 28, 2024
Read Article
Bombay High Court Allows Adani Electricity to Cut 209 Mangroves for Infrastructure Project
Real Estate Mumbai

Bombay High Court Allows Adani Electricity to Cut 209 Mangroves for Infrastructure Project

The Bombay High Court has issued a ruling permitting Adani Electricity Mumbai Infra Ltd. (AEMIL) to cut down 209 mangroves near Vasai Creek for a critical infrastructure project.

February 13, 2025
Read Article