Supreme Court Rules Hare Krishna Temple in Bengaluru Belongs to ISKCON Bangalore

What was the main dispute between ISKCON Bangalore and ISKCON Mumbai? A: The main dispute was over the ownership and control of the Hare Krishna Temple and its associated property in Bengaluru. ISKCON Mumbai claimed that the property belonged to them, while ISKCON Bangalore argued that it was an independent entity and the rightful owner. Q: What was the final decision of the Supreme Court? A: The Supreme Court ruled that the Hare Krishna Temple in Bengaluru belongs to ISKCON Bangalore, overturning a previous Karnataka High Court decision in favor of ISKCON Mumbai. Q: Why did the Supreme Court reject ISKCON Mumbai's claim? A: The Supreme Court rejected ISKCON Mumbai's claim because there was no evidence to support their ownership of the property. The court noted that the application for allotment was made by ISKCON Bangalore, and the sale deed was executed in their favor. Q: What is the significance of this ruling for ISKCON Bangalore? A: The ruling is significant for ISKCON Bangalore as it confirms their legal title to the Hare Krishna Temple and associated property in Bengaluru. It also prevents ISKCON Mumbai from interfering with their management and operations. Q: How long did the legal battle last? A: The legal battle lasted for 25 years, finally concluding with the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of ISKCON Bangalore.

Answer not available